- From: <jg@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jun 96 17:48:48 -0400
- To: burchard@cs.princeton.edu
- Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, fielding@ics.uci.edu
I agree with Koen on this one. I'm keeping the can of worms carefully closed. I'm still not convinced there is enough of a problem here to be worth fixing, and the suggestions I've seen all look more likely to confuse more people than leaving the document as is. And I certainly don't have time to make any more global terminology changes in the document. I'm going to rule out of order this terminology discussion. The spec, as written, seems understandable to most who've been reading it. We don't have time to deal with this now before proposed standard. If we find that implementers are getting confused, we can certainly worry about this terminology issue between proposed and draft standard, but for the little time left, I'd like everyone to worry about protocol problems, rather than slightly confusing terminology. - Jim Gettys
Received on Sunday, 2 June 1996 14:52:59 UTC