- From: <touch@isi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 14:04:16 -0700
- To: J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk, ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu
- Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, touch@isi.edu
> From ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu Thu Jun 13 13:42:48 1996 > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 16:41:55 -0400 (EDT) > From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu> > To: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk> > Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>, > http-wg <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, touch@ISI.EDU > Subject: Re: [touch@isi.edu: draft may be of interest] > > On Thu, 13 Jun 1996, Jon Crowcroft wrote: > > > > >I've completed and submitted an internet draft on > > >TCP Control Block Interdependence, which has some > > IMHO TCP is going to become less important in terms of bytes carried as > time goes on - media specific transport protocols are much better suited > for things like images, video, and sounds; the HTTP-NG philosophy is that > eventually TCP or it's replacement will basically just be used for text > and for control messages. > > Simon And by the same argument, it'd be easier to deploy these new transport protocols in an application, rather than waiting for them to appear in an OS. P-HTTP is basically "IP over TCP" - given the necessary chunking, muxing, etc. I don't know why that isn't as frightening to anyone else... Joe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Touch - touch@isi.edu http://www.isi.edu/~touch/ ISI / Project Leader, ATOMIC-2, LSAM http://www.isi.edu/atomic2/ USC / Research Assistant Prof. http://www.isi.edu/lsam/
Received on Thursday, 13 June 1996 14:10:52 UTC