Re: Shortening the draft.

On Thu, 23 May 1996 wrote:

> Hi,
> 	Just had a thought that might shorten the draft somewhat, how about 
> issuing the definition of the ebnf as a separate RFC? This would remove a whole 
> section.
This makes a lot of sense. The EBNF section is included in a number of
places besides the HTTP drafts. I think we've definitely reched the point
where a separate RFC is justified. I also agree with you that this sort ofr
change is more appropriate for future versions so HTTP 1.1 isn't needlessly

Gregory Woodhouse
home page:  
resource page:

Received on Thursday, 23 May 1996 12:39:02 UTC