- From: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 20:04:55 -0500 (CDT)
- To: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
On Sun, 19 May 1996, Koen Holtman wrote: > > I just spent half a day being completely confused over what a > `resource entity' is or should be. The question is: if I replace the > English text bound to a generic resource by a version of this English > text with some spelling errors corrected, have I > a) changed the value of the existing English text resource entity > or > b) replaced the existing English text resource entity by another > English text resource entity? > > Under a) a resource entity is something like a variable or container. > Under b) a resource entity is something like a value or constant. > Earlier we were using the term "entity source" to have a meaning close to (a). At some point this term got changed to "resource entity", but those advocating the change had an entirely different meaning in mind. I believe that when I asked for a precise definition of "resource entity" I was told it was an entity with an entity-body (as opposed to an error message, for example). This is a fine definition of "resource entity", but then that term cannot be used in the text to have the meaning of a variable bound to changing content. The term "entity source" was not great, but at least it was clear. It meant a variable whose value changes only as a function of time. At any given time its value is an entity (or perhaps the content part of an entity). By contrast, a generic resource is a variable whose values are a function of time, client supplied headers, client IP-address etc. A plain resource is an entity source. A generic resource is made up of a number different entity sources (e.g. the English, French, etc. versions). At some point in the past the term "variant" was used instead of entity source. There was objection to this on the grounds that plain resources don't have variants. It is important to get this language straightened out. We already have ample evidence that the current document is confusing in this regard. John Franks Dept of Math. Northwestern University john@math.nwu.edu
Received on Sunday, 19 May 1996 18:05:45 UTC