- From: Dave Kristol <dmk@allegra.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 96 09:50:45 EDT
- To: mogul@pa.dec.com
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com> wrote: > That's a reasonable suggestion. I'd reword it slightly, > > ... the protocol requires that transparency may be relaxed only > > . by an explicit protocol-level request (when relaxed by client > or origin server) > . and with an explicit warning to the end user (when relaxed by > cache or client) And I'll have another go: ... the protocol requires that transparency may be relaxed . only by an explicit protocol-level request (when relaxed by client or origin server) . and only with an explicit warning to the end user (when relaxed by cache or client) Dave Kristol
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 1996 06:55:22 UTC