- From: Ted Hardie <hardie@merlot.arc.nasa.gov>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 11:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
I note that there has been a justification added for declaring that a last-byte-pos in byte range after the end of the entity should be read as naming the end of the entity, but I don't think the justification fully answers the objections raised in: http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/ange/archives/http-wg-archive/1012.html and re-iterated in http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/ange/archives/http-wg-archive/11196.html My objections are not strong enough to want to raise a big fuss over this--I think the current design risks semantic transparency in a small number of cases to reduce round trips in an equally small number of cases--but I would be interested in hearing any further arguments which the editorial group might have heard in favor of this language. regards, Ted Hardie
Received on Friday, 31 May 1996 11:24:51 UTC