RE: Content negotiation and Vary (1.3, 12, 13.5, 14.43) from Paul Leach on 1996-06-03 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 1996)

From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 10:27:30 -0700
To: "'jg@w3.org'" <jg@w3.org>, "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@liege.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Cc: "'http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'koen@win.tue.nl'" <koen@win.tue.nl>
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-77-MSG-960603172730Z-9440@abash1.microsoft.com>

Just a thought -- now that we have the "representation" word (which I
like), isn't what gets negotiated the representation, not the content?
I.e., we could replace "content negotiation" with "representation
negotiation" everywhere.

Paul

Received on Monday, 3 June 1996 10:56:28 UTC