w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from April to June 2002 by author

Aaron Smith

• Fwd: [RNIBCampaignforGoodWebDesign] RNIB Look Louder game: RNIB statement 21 June 2002, 15:30 hours (Friday, 21 June)
• Fwd: RE: (Access-UK) - totally astounding (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Tuesday, 28 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)

Access Systems

• Re: deque systems? (Sunday, 30 June)
• Re: OBJECT tag and the IE (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: pdf as text?? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: FW: JSTOR and accessibility (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Fw: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Fw: images used as form submit buttons /wrong URI (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Fw: images used as form submit buttons /wrong URI (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: complete trouble reports (how much configuration info?) (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css (Wednesday, 15 May)
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Java and accessibility (Monday, 13 May)
• RE: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: text in images (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Do not open attachment in: "Hi,your password" (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Fw: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: legal responsibility (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: word-wrap etc [was: Re: Request for input ...] (Sunday, 14 April)
• Re: Request for input - what to do with Web Services (Sunday, 14 April)

Al Gilman

• Re: Server Side Include Accessibility (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• complete trouble reports (how much configuration info?) (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: abbreviation title within a link: howto? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Web Services Architecture Requirements open for comment (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link (Thursday, 25 April)
• [off topic] new virus wrinkle (Monday, 22 April)
• RE: Label versus Title (Sunday, 21 April)
• RE: Label versus Title (Saturday, 20 April)
• word-wrap etc [was: Re: Request for input ...] (Sunday, 14 April)
• once more with word wrap - what to do with Web Services (Sunday, 14 April)
• Request for input - what to do with Web Services (Sunday, 14 April)

Alan Chuter

• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Check that all information conveyed with color is also available without color (Monday, 17 June)
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• RE: www.groningen-museum.nl (Thursday, 23 May)

Andrew Johns

• RE: Labels in Netscape (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Labels in Netscape (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• MAGpie 2.01 public beta (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: Real-time captions in streaming media (Thursday, 25 April)

Andrew McFarland

• Re: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web con tact management solution request:) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css (Tuesday, 14 May)
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: Software support for Aural styles (Monday, 8 April)

Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au

• Senate Inquiry into education of students with disabilities (Australia). (Sunday, 30 June)

Andy J. W. Affleck

• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope (Tuesday, 23 April)
• XHTML, CSS, 508 Standards (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope (Monday, 22 April)
• A new one: label vs. Scope (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: Label versus Title (Monday, 22 April)
• Label versus Title (Friday, 19 April)

Asif

• RE: Accessible _content_ management (Friday, 28 June)
• ASP.NET (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Disability Stats (Thursday, 18 April)

Audrey J. Gorman

• FW: JSTOR and accessibility (Tuesday, 28 May)

Barry McMullin

• RE: Published work on Accessibility available (Tuesday, 2 April)
• Re: Published work on Accessibility available (Tuesday, 2 April)

Bill Mason

• Re: Labels in Netscape (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)

Bob Regan

• RE: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Wednesday, 24 April)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people (Friday, 21 June)
• RE: aural supplementation for minority language pages (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: aural supplementation for minority language pages (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: ASP.NET (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: Check that all information conveyed with color is also available without color (Monday, 17 June)
• Usability and Accessibility presentation RE: WebXTutti (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy (Monday, 10 June)
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: CSS percentage sizing (Thursday, 6 June)
• Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: FW: JSTOR and accessibility (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: FW: JSTOR and accessibility (Tuesday, 28 May)
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: Online caption typography (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Saturday, 11 May)
• Re: Maps and accessibility (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Help with Accessibility survey (Sunday, 5 May)
• RE: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: text in images (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Query re authoring tool compliance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pagesaccessible. (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: FW: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: Font streaming - good or bad? (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: Real-time captions in streaming media (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Font streaming - good or bad? (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Wednesday, 24 April)
• You can download the Vsign Builder and Player free (fwd) (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Tuesday, 23 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Tuesday, 23 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Prototype Accessibility Proxy (RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs) (Tuesday, 23 April)
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Credit Union Website Accessibility (Thursday, 18 April)
• RE: newsletter formats for email (Wednesday, 17 April)
• RE: long tables (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Re: CSS sizing (Wednesday, 10 April)

Chris Croome

• Re: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web contact management solution request:) (Thursday, 27 June)

Christian Seus

• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pagesaccessible. (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. (Friday, 26 April)

Cynthia Waddell

• RE: RE: German accessibility legislation (Tuesday, 25 June)

Dan Billingsley

• RE: Accessible Navigation Menus (Tuesday, 21 May)

Dana Louise Simberkoff

• RE: Educational Technology Journal -- accessibility edition (Thursday, 13 June)
• Announcement-AccVerify Usability Visual Test Manager (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Announcement-HiSoftware's Accessibility Interview Wizard provides the bridge between automated and visual testing (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Announcement-HiSoftware's Accessibility Interview Wizard provides the bridge between automated and visual testing (Tuesday, 7 May)
• RE: Published work on Accessibility available (Tuesday, 2 April)

Danny Ayers

• RE: CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? (Thursday, 16 May)
• RE: CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? (Wednesday, 15 May)

David Bacon

• Bobby Accessibility Error (Tuesday, 2 April)

David Poehlman

• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Monday, 1 July)
• deque systems? (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Saturday, 29 June)
• Fw: Course on repairing web pages (Friday, 28 June)
• Fw: Gnome 2.0 Released! (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: accessible web contact management solution request: (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Fw: accessible web contact management solution request: (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Fw: JAWS and Web forms (Tuesday, 25 June)
• media:Fw: Blind People Can't Read Flash (Wednesday, 19 June)
• media:Fw: Microsoft Drops Java Support (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Fw: Educational Technology Journal -- accessibility edition (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: 30 days to a more accessible Weblog (Tuesday, 11 June)
• media:Connecticut to Enforce Accessibility Guidelines (Friday, 7 June)
• Fw: Review of Hal, Window-Eyes and JAWS for Windows (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: Open Beta: Testing & Reporting on Accessibility & Usability of Applications (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Guideline on avoiding visual language? (Monday, 3 June)
• objectionable language retraction: (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: Guideline on avoiding visual language? (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Windows xp Screen reader (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Windows xp Screen reader (Thursday, 30 May)
• oops, we need a new guideline in wcag 2.0: (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• special announcement:Fw: Accessibility Forum June 2002 Webcast (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: JSTOR and accessibility (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• Fw: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Wednesday, 22 May)
• media:Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: Java and accessibility (Monday, 13 May)
• Fw: MVU OID Standards - Accessibility Standards Added (fwd) (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: MAGpie 2.01 public beta (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: text in images (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: media: government computer news: "beyond Section 508: (Tuesday, 30 April)
• media: government computer news: "beyond Section 508: (Monday, 29 April)
• Fw: Simplified Text: Examples and Resources (Saturday, 27 April)
• Fw: Link to us at DisabilityDirect.gov (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. (Friday, 26 April)
• good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: longdesc for an image used as a link (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Tuesday, 23 April)
• media:Fw: Web Content Gains New Flash (Tuesday, 23 April)
• media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Written Direct Testimony of Chris Hofstader in MS case (Thursday, 18 April)
• media:Fw: Web Privacy Standard: It's a Start (Wednesday, 17 April)
• a site to love: (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Fw: About an article I'm writing - making webpages accessible (Sunday, 14 April)
• note: Resource: Simplified Web Accessibility Guide (Saturday, 13 April)
• Fw: [cmac-access] Resource: Simplified Web Accessibility Guide (Friday, 12 April)
• Fw: correction to my earlier post on the guide: (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Fw: A Guide to Making Documents Accessible to People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Software support for Aural styles (Monday, 8 April)
• Fw: corporate e-learning accessibility - your experiences requested (Sunday, 7 April)
• Re: Accessibility of PDF files & editing them (Thursday, 4 April)

David R. Stong

• JAWS access to Web forms (Sunday, 5 May)

David Sloan

• Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled (Wednesday, 1 May)

David Woolley

• Re: onfocus-onmouseover xhtml (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Labels in Netscape (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: aural supplementation for minority language pages (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> (Monday, 17 June)
• SVG List Accessibility Thread (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: CSS percentage sizing (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: OT: lynx config problems with firewall (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: JSTOR and accessibility (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: crawling validator (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: crawling validator (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: Accessibility issues in CSS3 Colour (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Accessibility issues in CSS3 Colour (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: Linearising layout tables (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: Maps and accessibility (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Do not open attachment in: "Hi,your password" (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: FW: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Fwd: Macromedia Accessibility webcast...Please distribute (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Font streaming - good or bad? (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Label versus Title (Sunday, 21 April)
• Re: Label versus Title (Sunday, 21 April)
• Re: Nielsen-Norman Studies on Children & Seniors (Saturday, 20 April)
• Re: Label versus Title (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: newsletter formats for email (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: word-wrap etc [was: Re: Request for input ...] (Sunday, 14 April)
• Re: defining table data for layout purposes (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: relative font sizing (Tuesday, 2 April)

David.Cobb@rnib.org.uk

• defining table data for layout purposes (Tuesday, 9 April)

Demonpenta2@aol.com

• Re: German accessibility legislation (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: US Politics: Bush to Dismantle Digital Divide Projects (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Off topic: Tim Berners Lee will receive the prize "Prince of Asturias" (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: media: government computer news: "beyond Section 508: (Monday, 29 April)
• Gateway donating computers to 501(c)'s. (Wednesday, 3 April)

Denise Wood

• RE: compliance and layout tables revisited (Tuesday, 7 May)
• RE: Query re authoring tool compliance (Tuesday, 7 May)
• RE: Query re authoring tool compliance (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Query re authoring tool compliance (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: site maps (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: Frontpage to Flash move (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Sunday, 28 April)
• RE: Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Sunday, 28 April)
• RE: Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Sunday, 28 April)
• Re[2]: Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Saturday, 27 April)
• Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Saturday, 27 April)
• FW: Real-time captions in streaming media (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: Real-time captions in streaming media (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: newsletter formats for email (Wednesday, 17 April)
• RE: legal responsibility (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Learning About Web Accessibility (Friday, 12 April)

EDixon@rnib.org.uk

• Java and accessibility (Monday, 13 May)
• Arachnophilia 5.1 Web authoring tool (Tuesday, 9 April)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• Re: speak plugins? (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Off topic: Tim Berners Lee will receive the prize "Prince of Asturias" (Friday, 24 May)
• Off topic: Tim Berners Lee will receive the prize "Prince of Asturias" (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities (Wednesday, 24 April)

Erik Hodge

• Virus alert: [was: Hi,your password] (Monday, 29 April)

ezgo@w3.org

• 超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 fV4F64fHcWUZ4Ajtnkg6LV (Sunday, 16 June)

George Kerscher

• RE: linking to transcripts of audio files (Thursday, 4 April)

Glenda Watson Hyatt

• RE: pdf as text?? (Wednesday, 19 June)

goliver@accease.com

• longdesc for an image used as a link (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Please review: R2 proposal to supplement the current R1 proposal (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Accessible Mobile Phones (slightly ot) (Tuesday, 16 April)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• RE: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties (Friday, 26 April)

Gregor Wolbring

• Re: German accessibility legislation (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: German accessibility legislation (Monday, 24 June)
• Frontpage to Flash move (Sunday, 28 April)

Harry Woodrow

• RE: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)

Harvey Bingham

• Re: long tables (Monday, 15 April)

Hillary K. Norfleet

• RE: Site Check - http://www.baycoroad.org/ (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Site Check - http://www.baycoroad.org/ (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Site Check - http://www.baycoroad.org/ (Tuesday, 18 June)

Ineke van der Maat

• [OT] W3C-validator (Sunday, 23 June)
• Re: Fw: images used as form submit buttons /wrong URI (Friday, 24 May)
• Fw: images used as form submit buttons /wrong URI (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• Fw: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)

Israel Pinto

• RE: Accessibility of PDF files & editing them (Thursday, 4 April)

Jason Megginson

• RE: pdf as text?? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)
• RE: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)
• RE: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)

Jason Ramsay-Brown

• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? (Wednesday, 22 May)

Jean-Marie D'Amour

• Re: Fw: JAWS and Web forms (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)

Jens Peter

• Re: German accessibility legislation (Monday, 24 June)

Jerry Weichbrodt

• Re: pdf as text?? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)

Jim Allan

• RE: Accessible Navigation Menus (Tuesday, 21 May)
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Tuesday, 23 April)

Jim Byrne

• Re: CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? (Thursday, 16 May)
• CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Wednesday, 24 April)
• popup Javascript alert - accessible? (Tuesday, 23 April)

Jim Ley

• Re: onfocus-onmouseover xhtml (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: Accessible Navigation Menus (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: popup Javascript alert - accessible? (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: word-wrap etc [was: Re: Request for input ...] (Sunday, 14 April)

Jim Thatcher

• RE: issues surrounding the use of images to submit forms (Saturday, 25 May)
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• RE: another forms question (Thursday, 16 May)
• RE: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• RE: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Saturday, 27 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Monday, 22 April)
• RE: Label versus Title (Saturday, 20 April)
• RE: long tables (Monday, 15 April)
• RE: Learning About Web Accessibility (Thursday, 11 April)

Jim Tobias

• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Constructing Accessible Web Sites (Friday, 12 April)

Jo Miller

• linking to transcripts of audio files (Thursday, 4 April)

Joe Clark

• Accessible movies in the _Star_ (Saturday, 15 June)
• Newspapers and weblogs; XML and academia (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: 30 days to a more accessible Weblog (Thursday, 13 June)
• 30 days to a more accessible Weblog (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Online caption typography (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: another forms question (Thursday, 16 May)
• Accessibility issues in CSS3 Colour (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 (Monday, 29 April)
• CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 (Monday, 29 April)
• Compliance and html validation - how to interpret? (Saturday, 27 April)
• Flash access articles posted (Friday, 26 April)
• Real-time captions in streaming media (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Written Direct Testimony of Chris Hofstader in MS case (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Software support for Aural styles (Friday, 5 April)
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> (Friday, 5 April)

Joel Sanda

• RE: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)

Joel Ward

• Re: pdf as text?? (Wednesday, 19 June)

John Foliot - bytown internet

• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Page validation (was RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: JSTOR and accessibility (Tuesday, 28 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)

John Morse

• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)

john_slatin

• RE: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties (Thursday, 25 April)

Jon Hanna

• RE: Accessible _content_ management (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Server Side Include Accessibility (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: ASP.NET (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: pdf as text?? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: Off topic: Tim Berners Lee will receive the prize "Prince of Asturias" (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• RE: Linearising layout tables (Wednesday, 8 May)
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community (Thursday, 2 May)
• RE: popup Javascript alert - accessible? (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: newsletter formats for email (Wednesday, 17 April)
• RE: Patent on XML and XSLT together? (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RE: Patent on XML and XSLT together? (Tuesday, 16 April)

jonathan chetwynd

• onfocus-onmouseover xhtml (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: pdf as text?? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: <a href="" meta=""> (Monday, 17 June)
• <a href="" meta=""> (Sunday, 16 June)
• image and font scaling (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: Windows xp Screen reader (Thursday, 30 May)
• Windows xp Screen reader (Thursday, 30 May)
• speak plugins? (Tuesday, 28 May)
• www.groningen-museum.nl (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: abbreviation title within a link: howto? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Accessible Navigation Menus (Tuesday, 21 May)
• abbreviation title within a link: howto? (Wednesday, 1 May)
• google history problem: philosophical, well maybe (Tuesday, 14 May)
• crawling validator (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: Help sections - best practice (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: Help sections - best practice (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Friday, 3 May)
• keyboard shortcut for: minimise maximise and close (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties (Thursday, 25 April)
• Big oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities (Wednesday, 24 April)
• oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities (Wednesday, 24 April)
• oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabilities (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Designing websites for people with learning disabilities (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: Seeking guidance...a thread renewed? (Sunday, 21 April)
• Re: Nielsen-Norman Studies on Children & Seniors (Saturday, 20 April)
• self-selection, transparency, and priorities was Re: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• £48 is not very accessible! Re: Learning About Web Accessibility (Friday, 12 April)
• Slashdot article Re: unasked for downloads? (Tuesday, 9 April)

Judy Brewer

• Tone and language (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Comments? Requirements for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (Thursday, 2 May)
• Do not open attachment in: "Hi,your password" (Monday, 29 April)

Jukka Korpela

• RE: OBJECT tag and the IE (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Accessibility Valet (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: aural supplementation for minority language pages (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Using content negotiation to serve content variants to people wit h special needs? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: table captions (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy (Monday, 10 June)
• RE: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: Guideline on avoiding visual language? (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: images used as form submit buttons (Monday, 27 May)
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• RE: abbreviation title within a link: howto? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: CSS accessibility problems: is markup dead? (Thursday, 16 May)
• RE: inline styles vs. linked css (Monday, 13 May)
• RE: longdesc for an image used as a link (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: CSS sizing (Thursday, 4 April)

Jérôme Ernu

• RE: 30 days to a more accessible Weblog (Tuesday, 11 June)
• Accessibility lawsuit (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Monday, 22 April)
• Question about the use of "title" tag and screen readers (Thursday, 11 April)

Kathleen Anderson

• Re: Check that all information conveyed with color is also available without color (Monday, 17 June)
• [media] Goodies Thoughts - W3C Wants You (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: note: Resource: Simplified Web Accessibility Guide (Saturday, 13 April)

Kelly Ford

• RE: Fw: JAWS and Web forms (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: JAWS access to Web forms (Sunday, 5 May)

kestrell

• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Saturday, 1 June)

Kirsten Williams

• Server Side Include Accessibility (Thursday, 27 June)

Kjetil Kjernsmo

• Re: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)

kk@w3.org

• ＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊ (Thursday, 27 June)

Kristina Seyer Smith

• Re: Maps and accessibility (Tuesday, 7 May)

Kynn Bartlett

• IWA Italy Accessibility Project (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Friday, 28 June)
• Online Course on Web Accessibility in July (Wednesday, 19 June)
• US Politics: Bush to Dismantle Digital Divide Projects (Thursday, 30 May)
• Slightly Off-Topic: CSS book complete (Sunday, 19 May)

kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com

• Re: Accessible _content_ management (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: Learning About Web Accessibility (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Learning About Web Accessibility (Friday, 12 April)

Leslie K. Yoder

• Re: Check that all information conveyed with color is also available without color (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Interesting Article in the NY Times (Monday, 10 June)

Liz Fuller

• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)
• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)
• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)

Lubow Scott

• Accessible Navigation Menus (Tuesday, 21 May)

Marja-Riitta Koivunen

• RE: oops was Designing websites for people with learning disabili ties (Thursday, 25 April)

Mark Magennis

• RE: Disability Stats (Thursday, 18 April)

Martin McCormick

• Re: free/not free proprietary (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Re: Accessibility problems with Blackboard? (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Something else interesting from the BBC (Monday, 29 April)

Martin Sloan

• Re: RE: German accessibility legislation (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: RE: German accessibility legislation (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: RE: legal responsibility (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: legal responsibility (Tuesday, 16 April)

Masafumi NAKANE

• Re: Post-F2F: Meeting Jack La Lanne (Tuesday, 2 April)

Michael R. Burks

• RE: Accessible _content_ management (Sunday, 30 June)
• RE: German accessibility legislation (Tuesday, 25 June)
• An accessible site for the World Cup Soccer Matches (Monday, 10 June)
• Interesting Article in the NY Times (Monday, 10 June)
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)

Michelle Podd

• Re: another forms question (Friday, 17 May)
• another forms question (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Tuesday, 7 May)
• compliance and layout tables revisited (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: newsletter formats for email (Wednesday, 17 April)
• newsletter formats for email (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: a site to love: (Wednesday, 17 April)
• relative font sizing (Tuesday, 2 April)

Mike Scott

• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• RE: Linearising layout tables (Thursday, 9 May)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Tuesday, 23 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Monday, 22 April)
• RE: relative font sizing (Tuesday, 2 April)

Nick Kew

• Java (Re: deque systems?) (Saturday, 29 June)
• Accessibility Valet (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Fwd: RE: (Access-UK) - totally astounding (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: FYI - Online HTML viewers (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML (Monday, 3 June)
• Re: Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML (Monday, 3 June)
• Conveying metadata unobtrusively in HTML (Sunday, 2 June)
• Re: Page validation (was RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: crawling validator (Thursday, 16 May)
• Linearising layout tables (Wednesday, 8 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Prototype Accessibility Proxy (RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs) (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Prototype Accessibility Proxy (RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs) (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Prototype Accessibility Proxy (RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs) (Monday, 22 April)
• RE: Seeking guidance...a thread renewed? (Sunday, 21 April)
• RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Written Direct Testimony of Chris Hofstader in MS case (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Written Direct Testimony of Chris Hofstader in MS case (Thursday, 18 April)
• Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs (Thursday, 18 April)

Nissen, Dan E

• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy (Monday, 10 June)
• RE: Trip report - WebXTutti, Italy (Monday, 10 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• RE: Time and Accessibility (Thursday, 30 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone - Usability (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: Federal Credit Union Question ADA related (Friday, 24 May)

Pat Byrne

• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited - useful article (Friday, 10 May)

Patrick Burke

• RE: German accessibility legislation (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: JAWS access to Web forms (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Something else interesting from the BBC (Betsie) (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Nielsen-Norman Studies on Children & Seniors (Saturday, 20 April)
• Nielsen-Norman Studies on Children & Seniors (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Learning About Web Accessibility (Thursday, 11 April)

PERRY, Grant

• Software support for Aural styles (Friday, 5 April)

Peter Verhoeven

• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Wednesday, 24 April)
• WCAG Priorities does not help the low vision (Wednesday, 24 April)

Phill Jenkins

• Re: Page validation (was RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone - Usability (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Saturday, 11 May)
• free/not free proprietary (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: CSS Layouts for Netscape 4 (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: A new one: label vs. Scope (Monday, 22 April)

phoenixl

• Online bibliography for research project (Sunday, 23 June)
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing - Timers (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: Accessibility & Usability Testing (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by (Thursday, 30 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone) (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Time and Accessibility (RE: was Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone - Usability (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Thursday, 30 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 28 May)
• PARC Releases Popout Prism Software (Enhanced Thumbnail Browser) (Tuesday, 9 April)

Rebecca Cox

• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: Query re authoring tool compliance (Monday, 6 May)
• Maps and accessibility (Monday, 6 May)

Reidy Brown

• Blackboard Accessibility (Thursday, 4 April)

Robert B. Yonaitis

• New Accessibility Tools for Microsoft Office (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing - Timers (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing (Thursday, 13 June)
• Another Important Note re:Usability / Accessibility Testing (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: Accessibility & Usability Testing (Thursday, 13 June)
• Accessibility & Usability Testing (Monday, 10 June)
• Open Beta: Testing & Reporting on Accessibility & Usability of Applications (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Tuesday, 4 June)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Wednesday, 29 May)
• AccVerify SE for FrontPage - Request for Beta Participation (Monday, 27 May)
• Hi-Caption 1.75 Software Beta Testers Needed (Sunday, 26 May)
• Sorry For Extra Post (Thursday, 16 May)
• May be of Interest to this group (Thursday, 16 May)
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pagesaccessible. (Friday, 26 April)

robert neff

• question (Sunday, 28 April)
• Fwd: Macromedia Accessibility webcast...Please distribute (Thursday, 25 April)

Royce Shin

• Describing TABLE structure (Friday, 12 April)

Ruben Arrizabalaga

• OBJECT tag and the IE (Thursday, 27 June)

RUST Randal

• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• table captions (Thursday, 13 June)
• RE: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: thoughts?Fw: Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Thursday, 23 May)
• RE: media:Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: media:Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• RE: CSS Positioning Solution was: CSS positioning aint good enoug h? (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Thursday, 25 April)
• Are Forms Tabular Data? (Wednesday, 10 April)

Scarlett Julian (ED)

• RE: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web c on tact management solution request:) (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Accessible _content_ management (was RE: accessible web con tact management solution request:) (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: accessible web contact management solution request: (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: accessible web contact management solution request: (Wednesday, 26 June)
• aural supplementation for minority language pages (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: pdf as text?? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• OT: lynx config problems with firewall (Friday, 31 May)
• RE: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• issues surrounding the use of images to submit forms (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• inline styles vs. linked css (Monday, 13 May)
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community (Friday, 3 May)
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community (Friday, 3 May)
• FW: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: CSS positioning aint good enough? (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: legal responsibility (Monday, 22 April)
• legal responsibility (Tuesday, 16 April)
• long tables (Monday, 15 April)
• RE: Learning About Web Accessibility (Friday, 12 April)

SHARPE, Ian

• RE: FYI - Online HTML viewers (Friday, 14 June)
• FYI - Online HTML viewers (Thursday, 13 June)
• CSS percentage sizing (Wednesday, 5 June)
• CSS positioning aint good enough? (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: Accessibility Proxy seeks interested ISPs (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: Patent on XML and XSLT together? (Tuesday, 16 April)
• FW: Patent on XML and XSLT together? (Tuesday, 16 April)
• CSS sizing (Wednesday, 3 April)

Shawn Lawton Henry

• RE: Accessibility lawsuit (Friday, 7 June)
• RE: Accessibility lawsuit (Thursday, 6 June)

Simon White

• RE: RE: German accessibility legislation (Tuesday, 25 June)
• European Union accessibility legislation update (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: German accessibility legislation (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: German accessibility legislation (Monday, 24 June)
• German accessibility legislation (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Friday, 21 June)
• Poll results so far... (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Interesting Article in the NY Times (Monday, 10 June)
• Flash compliance (Friday, 7 June)
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• RE: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• RE: Help sections - best practice (Monday, 13 May)
• Help sections - best practice (Thursday, 9 May)
• Help with Accessibility survey (Friday, 3 May)
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community (Friday, 3 May)
• RE: E-voting: good for disabled community (Friday, 3 May)
• E-voting: good for disabled community (Thursday, 2 May)
• RE: Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled (Wednesday, 1 May)
• RE: Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled (Wednesday, 1 May)
• site maps (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: good response:Fw: Time and Cost Modeling of making web pages accessible. (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: Font streaming - good or bad? (Thursday, 25 April)
• Font streaming - good or bad? (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Audible books - good idea done badly... (Monday, 22 April)
• RE: Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• Personalisation - your thoughts please (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: legal responsibility (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RE: Accessible mobile phones (slightly ot) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Kynn's course: was Learning about Web Accessibility (Friday, 12 April)

Snyder, Ethan [JJCUS]

• RE: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Tuesday, 23 April)

Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org.au

• text in images (Thursday, 2 May)

Steven McCaffrey

• RE: Testing web page accessibility by phone (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: media:Fw: Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)
• Re: Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)

Suzanne Nikolaisen

• Federal Credit Union Question ADA related (Friday, 24 May)
• Flash News Flash: It's Accessible (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Credit Union Website Accessibility (Thursday, 18 April)
• Learning About Web Accessibility (Thursday, 11 April)

T. V. Raman

• Emacspeak-16.0 (CleverDog) Unleashed! (Saturday, 4 May)

Thanasis Kinias

• Re: crawling validator (Thursday, 16 May)

Tina Marie Holmboe

• Re: Server Side Include Accessibility (Thursday, 27 June)
• Re: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: newsletter formats for email (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: newsletter formats for email (Wednesday, 17 April)

Tom Gilder

• Re: OBJECT tag and the IE (Thursday, 27 June)
• Accessibility article on BBC News Online (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: ASP.NET (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Interesting Poll on Accessibility (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: HTML 4.x or XHTML for accessibility (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: Accessibility lawsuit (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Guideline on avoiding visual language? (Saturday, 1 June)
• Re: images used as form submit buttons (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: place-holding characters in form elements (Thursday, 23 May)
• Re: media:Fw: Will the New AOL Break Your Site? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: visibility of 'skip links' (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Media: Olympics Site Targets Disabled (Wednesday, 1 May)

Tom James

• RE: Standards Compliant = No support for NN4? (Wednesday, 19 June)

Vadim Plessky

• Re: compliance and layout tables revisited (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: free/not free proprietary (Sunday, 12 May)
• Re: Windows XP Caution (Thursday, 25 April)

Viral.Patel@exim.gov

• Accesibility of PDF files & editing them (Tuesday, 2 April)

Wayne Myers

• [OT] Betsie Security Bugfix Release Version 1.5.12 (Wednesday, 26 June)

Webmaster

• Hi,your password (Monday, 29 April)

Wendy Fraser

• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Friday, 24 May)
• RE: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites (Wednesday, 22 May)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2002 23:20:32 UTC