- From: Jukka Korpela <jukka.korpela@tieke.fi>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 14:22:31 +0300
- To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Scarlett Julian (ED) wrote: > Are there any issues raised by the use of inline > styling rather than using a linked style sheet? Linked style sheets are recommended, apparently for reasons of maintenance and consistence: "Use linked style sheets rather than embedded styles, and avoid inline style sheets." http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-CSS-TECHS/#consistency It's difficult to say what practical _accessibility_ implications this might have. Generally, what's simple and logical and consistent tends to be better in the long run in all respects, other things being equal. But more specifically, isolating all CSS from HTML and gathering all CSS rules to a single file (or a small set of files) makes it much easier to consider whether the stylistic suggestions are suitable for a particular user or environment and to construct another style sheet (modified or completely new) as needed. For example, if you use different fonts in a document for different ingredients there, it's easier to consider how a _corresponding_ styling could be done using colors, or voice, or other methods, when you just need to analyze a relatively short CSS file. Besides, a linked style sheet can be made optional (or "alternate"), so that the user can switch it off without switching off all CSS. In particular, with linked style sheets you could write one CSS file that you would very much like to be applied and another CSS file that is of secondary importance or otherwise more optional. -- Jukka Korpela TIEKE Tietoyhteiskunnan kehittämiskeskus ry Finnish Information Society Development Centre Salomonkatu 17 A, 10th floor, FIN - 00100 HELSINKI, FINLAND Phone: +358 9 4763 0397 Fax: +358 9 4763 0399 http://www.tieke.fi jukka.korpela@tieke.fi
Received on Monday, 13 May 2002 07:22:46 UTC