- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:55:39 -0000
- To: "WAI List \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
"John Foliot - bytown internet" <foliot@bytowninternet.com> > We did a test, and while HTML 4.01 Trans. was decent, and HTML4.01 Strict > even better, pages authored to XHTML strict were virtually flawless. Now > the Blackberry is not quite as ubiquitous as the Palm (yet), but it ain't no > sci-fi toy either... there are plenty of them out there all ready. As a > content owner I would want my information available to the broadest possible > audience (right?), and so, whenever possible, I would look to use XHTML, > only because it does just that. but for Microsoft Pocket IE, on the iPaq renders the XML processing instruction, so that clearly does not understand xhtml. What was the distinction between HTML 4.01 strict and xhtml 1.0 strict (xhtml 1.1 is clearly not an option as that should not be served as text/html) Jim.
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 08:58:20 UTC