- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:45:50 -0400
- To: Jukka Korpela <jukka.korpela@tieke.fi>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
one way that long desc is supported is to provide a link to the description within the long desc so it might be a tad confusing to nest a link within a link. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jukka Korpela" <jukka.korpela@tieke.fi> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:05 AM Subject: RE: longdesc for an image used as a link goliver@accease.com wrote: > Anyone ever felt compelled to use the longdesc > attribute for an image used as a link? If I ever felt _compelled_ to use the longdesc attribute, I would _know_ that this is not the place to use it! The point is that since browser support is, eh, how would I put it, limited, one shouldn't _rely_ on the longdesc attribute, now or in the next few years. If the user needs to be able to access a long description of the image, the best way is to write a normal link to the description, in a manner that makes it fairly obvious what it is. For example, you could put a caption text below the image and make it a link, or you could explicitly write "<p>(There is also a <a href="...">textual description of our organization</a> available.)</p>", or you could, if you prefer, write a "D link". Having done that, you could additionally use a longdesc attribute. -- Jukka Korpela TIEKE Tietoyhteiskunnan kehittämiskeskus ry Finnish Information Society Development Centre Salomonkatu 17 A, 10th floor, FIN - 00100 HELSINKI, FINLAND Phone: +358 9 4763 0397 Fax: +358 9 4763 0399 http://www.tieke.fi jukka.korpela@tieke.fi
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 06:46:19 UTC