- From: phoenixl <phoenixl@sonic.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 20:26:04 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, The issue of limitis is tricky. I also believe that achievability plays a role too. For example, can Mount Everest be considered accessible? If a significant amount of the US fiscal resources were made available, Mount Everest could probably be made accessible. As near as I can tell, there really hasn't been much research into what aspects of a web page can increase the amount of time needed for blind subjects to use web pages. Some improvements might actually be quite easy. Scott > By taking an ad absurdum example it's easy to show that time is an > accessibility issue - would you consider a wheelchair user travelling 20 > miles under his or her own steam to be an equally accessible form of > transportation to a wheelchair-enabled bus? > > One of the problems with time (and also effort, concentration, and other > requirements that can increase when one is making use of an accessibility > feature), is that it is hard to measure in a way that will be valid for all > users, and hard to decide on clear limits for (how slow does something have > to be before it really affects accessibility?). This is unsatisfying for > those of us who attempt to come up with solutions, mainly technical, to > these problems.
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 23:26:40 UTC