- From: Ineke van der Maat <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:42:32 +0200
- To: "Access Systems" <accessys@smart.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello Bob and other listmembers Yes, that Dutch parlementarian site is looking terrible in Lynx. [transpix] and [bannertopnav] many times in the Lynxscreen. Just as terrible or more terrible is the live debate on television is going about: The fall of the enclave Screbrenica.. (That is what the NIOD-report is going about..) that brought the fall of the government just one month before scheduled parlemtarian elections at the 15th of May.. The sites of these two big Dutch parties http://pvda.nl and http://www.vvd.nl in Lynx are also very terrible.. Here is accessibility not a big issue.. even not in electiontime... and probably still more not since new List Pim Fortuyn gets so many seats in the polls (ca. 20 of 150!) Sorry.. don't cry... better times will come.. also here, where everything comes 50 years later.. Bob, will I learn you Dutch??? Greetings Ineke van der Maat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Access Systems" <accessys@smart.net> To: "Peter Verhoeven" <pav@oce.nl> Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:02 PM Subject: Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Peter Verhoeven wrote: > > checking it out running Lynx on a Linux machine gets > > > The new web site of the Dutch parlement http://www.tweede-kamer.nl has a > > frame construction, without using the <FRAMESET> tag. > > As far as I can see in the source they use scripting to define the frame > > structure. >
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 15:33:13 UTC