- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:55:19 +0100 (BST)
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
This is a proposal with a lot of potential for improving web accessibility, but it needs support (i.e. willingness to deploy it for customers) from ISPs. I am posting it here in the hope that some readers may be able to suggest ISPs likely to be interested in the proposal. BACKGROUND ========== According to RNIB figures, there are 1.7 million visually impaired people in the UK. Various other possibly-relevant disability statistics have recently been posted to this list. Disabled people will often be at a disadvantage in everyday activities such as shopping or going to the library, so in principle the Web has proportionally more to offer to them than to the fully able-bodied. Although the disabled are in no sense a homogenous group, they should be seen as a natural market to providers of Internet-based services. Whereas a well-designed website is by definition accessible to such people without undue effort or frustration, many thousands of websites place wholly unnecessary obstacles in the way of disabled users: for example, illegible small text and colour schemes, text-as-images, and misuse of frames, scripting, flash, or other forms of presentation. Pages presenting problems are represented in every sector, from the personal homepage through to household-name corporate and government sites. On the one hand, increasing awareness of the issue and the law should help improve the situation over time; on the other hand, there are a lot of seriously defective authoring and publishing tools, and ignorance is notoriously hard to cure. PROPOSAL ======== As a solution to improving accessibility on the web as a whole, an ISP could offer an Accessibility Proxy to users, undertaking content repair on-the-fly. Existing systems such as the Site Valet toolkit demonstrate the feasibility of repairing content, and mod_xml now provides the necessary technology foundation for us to undertake such repairs in real time, even on a heavily-loaded server or proxy. I also anticipate using it to enable a substantial expansion to the range of problems we can automatically repair. The advantage to users is not only much-improved web accessibility. It can also help with the most fundamental problem of many disabled users: the cost (real or perceived) of getting online in the first place. The minimum requirement for users of the proposed proxy has virtually no cost: "throwaway" secondhand hardware and free software will suffice for many users to get online. To the ISP, this will enable you to offer a much-enhanced service to a substantial group, as well as bring in new users. For the first ISP(s) to offer such services, there could also be some very positive publicity. To take this project forward, I need to make contact with ISPs who would be interested in offering such a service, either installed on their own networks or operated as a webservice. Any leads, or forwarding of this message, will be much appreciated. -- Nick Kew Site Valet - the mark of Quality on the Web. <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 16:55:23 UTC