- From: Patrick Burke <burke@ucla.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:12:18 -0700
- To: Jim Byrne <j.byrne@gcal.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3c_Access <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi Jim, There was a thread recently on the EASI list on this topic, with some familiar names contributing, so maybe they will repost their comments. I think the biggest problem with frames-based sites is more related to usability than technical accessibility. Frames force people to learn a new Web navigation metaphor. If they have learned to backtrack by using the Back button (or keystroke), & suddenly that doesn't work (or takes them out of the site), then they are likely to feel confused & disoriented, even if all the navigation links they need are right there in the nav frame. And there is the problem of losing the ability to bookmark a specific page. Also in my experience there is a fair amount of paranoia about frames among new users, just because it is one more element of new terminology in the already strange & unfamiliar world of Web navigation. Technically, though, for most screen readers that I am aware of, navigating frames pages isn't much different from other types (& may be easier, due to such things as the Jaws Frames List command INSERT+F9). As mentioned in the EASI thread, there may be lots of users out there with older technology that doesn't handle them so well. Also, I think there may be problems for low vision users, since the main active viewing area is smaller, & scrolling may not work as expected (see peter Verhoeven's comments earlier today on the effects of increasing font size). Patrick At 05:27 AM 4/24/02 , Jim Byrne wrote: >Hi, > >I am some accessibility advice to an organisation designing a Website aimed >at people with learning difficulties and those supporting people with >learning difficulties. The designers want to build the site based on using >Frames for navigation - quoting the W3c guidelines saying that they can be >made accessible. For all the reasons I have listed on my site (see >http://www.mcu.org.uk) I don't think this is a good idea - but I am keen to >hear what people on this list think of frames and accessibility. > >If your were building a Website from scratch, that had to be accessible - >would you use frames? If not why not? > >Thanks, >Jim
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 09:14:31 UTC