- From: phoenixl <phoenixl@sonic.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:18:36 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi,
A blind woman sent me this message and said I could post it to this mailing
list. She has some interesting comments on the "time" issue.
Scott
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Scott
My name is _______________, and I am a blind computer user who has
been on the Net since about 1993. I got to be part of that study the
Nielsen-Norman Group did last year, and I was tremendously impressed
by the thoroughness of their methods. I have also beta tested a few
web sites and products, and am currently alpha testing an accessible
online poker game. I think the best approach is to have the tester
in voice contact with the company developer or researcher. The
biggest hrudle in testing accessibility is to convey to the product
or software devloper the level of accessibility and usability
experienced by the disabled user. A user with limited mobility would
not be expected to spend twenty minutes locating and acitvating the
necessary switch/button.etc., but frequently blind users are
expected to hunt and search and go through extremely lengthy and
frustrating processes in order to have equal access, and this is
what is called "accessibility". Only by having the researcher
experience the same length of time and frustrations the blind user
experiences will the researcher comprehend all the possible
shortcomings of the product. I have pointed this out a couple of
times to other companies I have worked with, and they are always
surprised when I point out that just because it takes a sighted user
five seconds or less to visually see and click on an accessible
button on a web page, for example, does not mean that a blind user
with a screen reader can locate and confirm this is the appropriate
button in less than five minutes.
In closing, the researcher needs to go through the precise
experience the user has, and voice contact is the only method I can
think of for this. I suppose a close second would be to give the
user access to a web site where the researcher can track the user's
process online through the server but this does not seem to offer
the same level of feedback as live voice contact would.
Hope this helps.
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 11:19:21 UTC