- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:33:12 -0400
- To: phoenixl <phoenixl@sonic.net>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
there is no validation here. Now, if you use comparison strategies and ask what was good or bad or whatever about this site as opposed to this site and you knew at what starting point the person was at skill wise, you might get somewhere. I cannot even begin to answer most of the qquestions you asked here. Let's see. I'll try in my in your message below. Hisoftware products address these issues in that if their suggestions are followed, pages will be as accessible and usable as possible. 1. What is the purpose of the web page being presented? dp: if the page is well written and accessible, I could take a fair guess as could anyone looking at it. 2. How do you know you are correctly interpreting the purpose of the web page? dp: my experience with life tells me and if I don't know, I will tell you I don't know. 3. How long did it take you to correctly understand the purpose of the web page? dp: if I cannot understand the purpose of a web page within two minutes, I either ask someone if it is im;portant enough or I move on. 4. What on the web page is confusing to you? dp: now, this is highly subjective and of course, I'd have to have a page if something is confusing. and then again, perhaps nothing is confusing to me or the entire page is confusing to me but this question tells me nothing. I will give you this though. I have seen pages where the same links repeat several times on the page in the liniar top to bottom fashion of my reader and this is quite strange to me but I have learned that it is the way some pages are marked up and that the page is not actually liniarized to most people. 5. What on the web page did you use incorrectly? dp: again, can I answer nothing?
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2002 20:33:44 UTC