- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:33:25 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jim Byrne <j.byrne@gcal.ac.uk>
- cc: W3c_Access <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi, I wouldn't use frames because of the problems that they cause for bookmarking. If I really thought people knew how to make them work I would - but I would make sure that there was a good noframes section that meant people could live with or without them. I saw a good example of this when I was looking for a cheap hotel, but I forget where it was now <sigh/>. I expect the frames thing to be solved in about 5 years, which would be nice - the idea is pretty useful. cheers Chaals On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Jim Byrne wrote: Hi, I am some accessibility advice to an organisation designing a Website aimed at people with learning difficulties and those supporting people with learning difficulties. The designers want to build the site based on using Frames for navigation - quoting the W3c guidelines saying that they can be made accessible. For all the reasons I have listed on my site (see http://www.mcu.org.uk) I don't think this is a good idea - but I am keen to hear what people on this list think of frames and accessibility. If your were building a Website from scratch, that had to be accessible - would you use frames? If not why not? Thanks, Jim -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 14:33:27 UTC