- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:18:36 -0400
- To: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
>1. Users must have the latest version of the Flash Player installed. Oh, so what. Time marches on. And it's free. >2. Users must use a screen reader that supports Microsoft Active >Accessibility (MSAA) (Do most versions of JAWS and other popular >readers currently IN USE support MSAA?) No real choice about that. The access infrastructure on other platforms is too skimpy. <http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbser=1189> >3. Navigating between Flash and non-Flash content, using the >keyboard only, is virtually impossible. And they may not be able to fix that. >4. Elaborate Flash movies may present information/content in >multiple places, simultaneously. Screen Reading software can only >describe information/content in one place at any given time. Nature of the beast. >5. Developers need to understand how to use the new accessibility features >of Flash properly, and then they must take the time to do so. Nature of the beast. >Given the above, I think it is premature to conclude that all >accessibilityissues with Flash have been eliminated with the latest >release of Flash MX. Yeah, but nobody went *that* far. I have a piece coming out at AListApart.com this Friday on Flash access. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> Weblogs and articles <http://joeclark.org/weblogs/> <http://joeclark.org/writing/> | <http://fawny.org/>
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 06:59:39 UTC