- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:18:36 -0400
- To: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
>1. Users must have the latest version of the Flash Player installed.
Oh, so what. Time marches on. And it's free.
>2. Users must use a screen reader that supports Microsoft Active
>Accessibility (MSAA) (Do most versions of JAWS and other popular
>readers currently IN USE support MSAA?)
No real choice about that. The access infrastructure on other
platforms is too skimpy.
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbser=1189>
>3. Navigating between Flash and non-Flash content, using the
>keyboard only, is virtually impossible.
And they may not be able to fix that.
>4. Elaborate Flash movies may present information/content in
>multiple places, simultaneously. Screen Reading software can only
>describe information/content in one place at any given time.
Nature of the beast.
>5. Developers need to understand how to use the new accessibility features
>of Flash properly, and then they must take the time to do so.
Nature of the beast.
>Given the above, I think it is premature to conclude that all
>accessibilityissues with Flash have been eliminated with the latest
>release of Flash MX.
Yeah, but nobody went *that* far.
I have a piece coming out at AListApart.com this Friday on Flash access.
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
Weblogs and articles <http://joeclark.org/weblogs/>
<http://joeclark.org/writing/> | <http://fawny.org/>
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 06:59:39 UTC