- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 23:09:37 +0100 (BST)
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Colour - and other visual styling - is a great tool for conveying information. For example, if we are evaluating something, we may use red to highlight an error, amber for a warning, and green for OK. But of course, that raises the obvious accessibility issue for the visually impaired. In Page Valet, visual information is duplicated in text: in particular, accessibility messages are prefixed with, for example, "WCAG2/High" to indicate a WCAG level 2 checkpoint that we have diagnosed with a high level of certainty. This is visually obtrusive, and I don't really like it. Another option I'm playing with is to abuse the "title" attribute for this kind of thing. The logic is that this becomes unobtrusive for visual users, but accessible to non-visual devices. It's not really right: technically there isn't a better mechanism in HTML, but an equivalent scripting solution is likely to be horribly long-winded and less well supported by assistive devices. I have a new service in preparation, and have just opened the first preview prototype at <URL:http://valet.webthing.com:8000/html-form.html>. This uses the title technique to highlight whether an attribute is valid, deprecated or bogus, duplicating visual information conveyed by colour. Comments please: is this technique a reasonable approach to the problem? Can anyone suggest a better approach? -- Nick Kew Available for contract work - Programming, Unix, Networking, Markup, etc.
Received on Sunday, 2 June 2002 18:10:33 UTC