- From: Andrew McFarland <andrew.mcfarland@unite.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:10:13 +0100
- To: wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 05:54 27/06/2002 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: <snip/> >But there is more to the accessibility of a system than its interface - >not >just the ability to add a longdesc or sevral, but also making it easy and >natural for content authors to ensure that documents being produced will >have >useful structure. Where necessary, of course, this requires appropriate >help >documentation. <snip/> Giving our CMS an accessible interface is pretty straightforward. At the moment it is possible to update content using Lynx, and the structure of the resulting document is controlled - one of our aims was to enable day to day content editing by people who have knowledge of HTML, which has the useful side effect of giving output documents a useful structure, assuming the templates are well structured. Every level two heading, for example, is in a h2 element, never a horrendous mix of font and strong elements. One thing that does concern me is the editing of the templates. At the moment, that is only done through a text editor, and as such it can't really be done by non-techies. Is that an accessibility issue? I'll see if I get a chance to set up an example site so I can show you what I am talking about. Andrew -- Andrew McFarland UNITE Solutions http://www.unite.net/
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 06:13:11 UTC