- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 16:53:03 -0400
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
and some of these pop up stoppers can cause problems for systems with screen readers due to resource issues. Now, we are getting way afield but this is not a screen reader issue necessarily as is pointed out below. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: Re: not jaws, just inaccessible:Fw: Inaccessible Web sites > Ok, I'll give you that, but how is ad freezing be the responsibility of a > screen reader? Why wouldn't a screen reader user use the same software that > a sighted person would use (such as Proxomitron, RJT, JunkBuster, or > Guidescope) to stop refreshing ads? For the same reasons that the sighted person wouldn't use it: - any add on software constitutes a technicality barrier for most users; - it may require additional clearances from network administrators; - many network administrators may refuse it because sites heavy in banner ads often have terms of use that forbid the use of banner blocking software; - the machine may be a shared resource and the network administrator may not want to impose such a policy for all users. On the other hand, a sighted user can much more easily ignore or dismiss the adverts (although people with some perception disorders may get confused as well). Popups are much more of a problem for blind users, but they are no more technically oriented than sighted users.
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2002 16:53:57 UTC