- From: Harry Woodrow <harrry@email.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:01:47 +0800
- To: "Tina Marie Holmboe" <tina@elfi.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
To get something that looks like frames is not that hard probably but is it as easy as it is with frames to have a standard header and side navigation and also allow users to include their own content in the main frame. Harry -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Tina Marie Holmboe Sent: Thursday, 25 April 2002 2:45 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 10:26:14PM +0100, David Woolley wrote: > of frames but the big 2 wanted animation instead, so we got the current > CSS positioning model which has great difficulty simulating frames layout > to the satisfaction of designers. I admit to being confused. Simulating a frames-based layout with CSS 2 is a rather simple thing. Which difficulties are you refering to ? -- - Tina H. --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 03:01:55 UTC