public-html@w3.org from January 2009: by thread

Re: Table feedback Ian Hickson (Saturday, 31 January)
My limited availability for next several days Michael(tm) Smith (Saturday, 31 January)
other constituencies for the discussion [was Re: certificates of anonymity] Dailey, David P. (Friday, 30 January)
- RE: other constituencies for the discussion [was Re: certificates of anonymity] Dailey, David P. (Friday, 30 January)
Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Simon Pieters (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6508] New: XHTML doctype without system identifier bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6507] New: Paragraphs section doesn't list all transparent elements bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 30 January)
ISSUE-54: <!DOCTYPE HTML SYSTEM "about:legacy-compat"> Ian Hickson (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6506] New: should h:tml draft include descriptions of element-specific APIs? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6505] New: should h:tml draft describe for authors how relative URLs are resolved? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6504] New: description of what target attribute represents should not use term "browsing context" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6503] New: to what degree should formalisms be used (if at all) in the h:tml draft? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6502] New: should the canvas element be omitted from h:tml draft? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6501] New: should obsolete elements be omitted from h:tml draft? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 30 January)
certificates of anonymity Dailey, David P. (Friday, 30 January)
[Bug 6497] New: Examples using title="" with line breaks bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 29 January)
[Bug 6496] New: Allow <img aria-labelledby> to act as a caption bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 29 January)
[Bug 6494] New: Make the requiredness about alt more obvious bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 29 January)
[Bug 6493] New: Use encoding of POSTing document for POST response if meta prescan fails bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 29 January)
[Bug 6491] New: <textarea wrap=off> not supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 29 January)
[Bug 6490] New: Event handler attributes should ignore event's interface bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 29 January)
Re: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
- RE: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode Travis Leithead (Thursday, 29 January)
  - RE: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
  - Re: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode Philip Taylor (Thursday, 29 January)
Requirements for testsuite Andi Sidwell (Wednesday, 28 January)
Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
- Re: Setting document.domain James Graham (Wednesday, 28 January)
  - Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Adam Barth (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
  - Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham (Thursday, 29 January)
D: a single letter element name for dialogue Gregory J. Rosmaita (Wednesday, 28 January)
- Re: <dialog> Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
  - Re: <dialog> Gregory J. Rosmaita (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: <dialog> Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: <dialog> Gregory J. Rosmaita (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: <dialog> Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 28 January)
- Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 28 January)
  - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Philip TAYLOR (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Philip TAYLOR (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - voting, surveys, juries, spec splitting Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: voting, surveys, juries, spec splitting Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 29 January)
- Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 28 January)
[Bug 6477] New: HTMLInputElement.width and height bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 27 January)
[Bug 6476] New: cross-origin media element loads and progress events bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 27 January)
window.onerror initial value Simon Pieters (Tuesday, 27 January)
[Bug 6475] New: Missing event handler attributes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 27 January)
[Bug 6474] New: Event handler DOM attributes on HTMLDocument bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 27 January)
Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Adrian Bateman (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Michael(tm) Smith (Monday, 26 January)
  - Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Charles McCathieNevile (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Adrian Bateman (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Michael(tm) Smith (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published L. David Baron (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Dan Connolly (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Charles McCathieNevile (Thursday, 29 January)
  - RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Adrian Bateman (Wednesday, 28 January)
- Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Philip Taylor (Monday, 26 January)
  - RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Adrian Bateman (Wednesday, 28 January)
Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) Thomas Broyer (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) Adam Barth (Monday, 26 January)
  - Re: Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 26 January)
Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Cameron McCormack (Monday, 26 January)
  - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Cameron McCormack (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Ian Hickson (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Simon Pieters (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten (Tuesday, 27 January)
  - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - RE: Registering the about: URI scheme Larry Masinter (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Simon Pieters (Tuesday, 27 January)
  - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme James Graham (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten (Tuesday, 27 January)
  - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten (Tuesday, 27 January)
  - Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Thomas Broyer (Tuesday, 27 January)
Re: about draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth (the Cookie Authentication Scheme) and ISSUE-13 Thomas Broyer (Saturday, 24 January)
Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) Sam Ruby (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) Simon Pieters (Monday, 26 January)
funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials Dan Connolly (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials Ian Hickson (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials Murray Maloney (Friday, 23 January)
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Monday, 26 January)
  - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Dean Edridge (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Jonas Sicking (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Jonas Sicking (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? James Graham (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 27 January)
Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings Ian Hickson (Friday, 23 January)
ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Sam Ruby (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Ian Hickson (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Steven Faulkner (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Ian Hickson (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD James Graham (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Karl Dubost (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD James Graham (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Sam Ruby (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Jonas Sicking (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 29 January)
- Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Henri Sivonen (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Robin Berjon (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Michael(tm) Smith (Monday, 26 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD L. David Baron (Friday, 23 January)
    - Default Style Sheet in Webkit and Mozilla Karl Dubost (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Jonas Sicking (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Philip TAYLOR (ret'd) (Friday, 23 January)
- RE: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Larry Masinter (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Steven Faulkner (Friday, 23 January)
Re: <bb> - typo, rename? Ian Hickson (Friday, 23 January)
Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Ian Hickson (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Jonas Sicking (Friday, 23 January)
RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Chris Wilson (Thursday, 22 January)
- RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Larry Masinter (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 27 January)
    - RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 James Graham (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Steven Faulkner (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Smylers (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 David Singer (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 David Singer (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 David Singer (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 David Singer (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Sam Ruby (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 John C. Vernaleo (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Smylers (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jens Meiert (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Steven Faulkner (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - RE: biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - HTML is a declarative mark-up language Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Philip TAYLOR (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Sam Ruby (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Philip TAYLOR (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Geoffrey Sneddon (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language L. David Baron (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Murray Maloney (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Simon Pieters (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Philip TAYLOR (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Patrick H Lauke (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Murray Maloney (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Murray Maloney (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Steven Faulkner (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks David Singer (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - RE: biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - RE: biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: biased surveys and other tricks Robin Berjon (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - RE: biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Michael(tm) Smith (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 James Graham (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Lachlan Hunt (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 28 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Philip TAYLOR (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? David Singer (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? David Singer (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Simon Pieters (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Karl Dubost (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Robert J Burns (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Robert J Burns (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Murray Maloney (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Lachlan Hunt (Thursday, 29 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Henri Sivonen (Friday, 30 January)
    - Glass houses and stones Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Glass houses and stones Henri Sivonen (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Robert J Burns (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Jonas Sicking (Friday, 30 January)
    - Openness creating deliverables that tend to reflect the views of the WG Robert J Burns (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Philip TAYLOR (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby (Saturday, 31 January)
    - RE: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Dailey, David P. (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Maciej Stachowiak (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 30 January)
    - Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] Rob Sayre (Saturday, 31 January)
    - Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Henri Sivonen (Wednesday, 28 January)
Dynamic entries in the Application Cache removed Ian Hickson (Thursday, 22 January)
html sans html Dailey, David P. (Wednesday, 21 January)
- Re: html sans html Ian Hickson (Thursday, 22 January)
  - Re: html sans html Kornel Lesiński (Thursday, 22 January)
    - RE: html sans html Travis Leithead (Thursday, 22 January)
[Bug 6464] New: Support meta refresh with quotes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 21 January)
RE: online/offline events and bubbling Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 21 January)
[Bug 6462] New: Self-reference and cyclic references in headers='' bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 21 January)
[Bug 6461] New: Fix the definition of "Origin" for Documents from javascript: URLs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 21 January)
Parsing problem with misnested tags Chris Reeve (Wednesday, 21 January)
[Bug 6460] New: Handle onerror feedback for Workers bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 21 January)
"Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Ben Millard (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Geoffrey Sneddon (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 23 January)
  - Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Dan Connolly (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Doug Schepers (Saturday, 24 January)
    - Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Ben Boyle (Saturday, 24 January)
[Bug 6457] New: registerContentHandler() and sniffing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 20 January)
RE: Origin IETF draft Larry Masinter (Monday, 19 January)
- Re: Origin IETF draft Adam Barth (Monday, 19 January)
Table Inspector updated to new HTML 5 algorithm James Graham (Monday, 19 January)
ACTION-96: Origin removal Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 18 January)
- Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Sam Ruby (Monday, 19 January)
  - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Simon Pieters (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal James Graham (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Sam Ruby (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Henri Sivonen (Tuesday, 20 January)
  - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 19 January)
  - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Dan Connolly (Monday, 19 January)
  - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Adam Barth (Thursday, 22 January)
    - RE: ACTION-96: Origin removal Larry Masinter (Thursday, 22 January)
    - RE: ACTION-96: Origin removal Larry Masinter (Friday, 23 January)
- Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 20 January)
  - Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 20 January)
RE: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Larry Masinter (Sunday, 18 January)
- Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Robert J Burns (Sunday, 18 January)
  - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Sam Ruby (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Ian Hickson (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Sam Ruby (Monday, 19 January)
    - Publishing HTML5 (was: Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4) Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Process Model [was: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4] Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 19 January)
    - RE: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Chris Wilson (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Maciej Stachowiak (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Sam Ruby (Monday, 19 January)
  - Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Jim Jewett (Tuesday, 20 January)
Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented Boris Zbarsky (Sunday, 18 January)
- Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented Boris Zbarsky (Sunday, 18 January)
Re: Detailed review of Section 1. Introduction. Chris Reeve (Sunday, 18 January)
- Re: Detailed review of Section 1. Introduction. Ian Hickson (Sunday, 18 January)
cloneNode() and script execution Hallvord R. M. Steen (Sunday, 18 January)
- Re: cloneNode() and script execution Andrew Fedoniouk (Sunday, 18 January)
- Re: cloneNode() and script execution Jonas Sicking (Sunday, 18 January)
- Re: cloneNode() and script execution Boris Zbarsky (Sunday, 18 January)
  - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Preston L. Bannister (Monday, 19 January)
  - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Hallvord R. M. Steen (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Jonas Sicking (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Boris Zbarsky (Monday, 19 January)
    - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Hallvord R. M. Steen (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Hallvord R. M. Steen (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: cloneNode() and script execution Jonas Sicking (Tuesday, 20 January)
Re: autocomplete on form (was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs) Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 16 January)
- Re: autocomplete on form Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 17 January)
  - Re: autocomplete on form Jonas Sicking (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: autocomplete on form Ben Boyle (Sunday, 18 January)
Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson (Friday, 16 January)
Re: Document conformance and non-empty <script src> Ian Hickson (Friday, 16 January)
Re: Determining Script Type Ian Hickson (Friday, 16 January)
Re: Race conditions in HTML 5? Ian Hickson (Thursday, 15 January)
Proposed amends to <small> element Bruce Lawson (Thursday, 15 January)
- Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Ben Millard (Saturday, 17 January)
  - Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Bruce Lawson (Saturday, 17 January)
  - Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Lachlan Hunt (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Bruce Lawson (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Patrick H. Lauke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Ben Millard (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Ian Hickson (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Bruce Lawson (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Daniel Glazman (Tuesday, 20 January)
[Bug 6440] New: To which elements applies the formatBlock command? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 15 January)
[Bug 6439] New: <area> should stringify href (like <a>) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 15 January)
[Bug 6438] New: Error in step 9.4 of the internal algorithm for scanning and assigning header cells bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 15 January)
Placing elements in the HTML namespace James Graham (Thursday, 15 January)
- Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Sam Ruby (Thursday, 15 January)
  - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace James Graham (Thursday, 15 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 15 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 15 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Simon Pieters (Thursday, 15 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Boris Zbarsky (Thursday, 15 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Simon Pieters (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Jonas Sicking (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Jonas Sicking (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Doug Schepers (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Jonas Sicking (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 15 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 16 January)
- Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Ian Hickson (Thursday, 15 January)
  - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Sam Ruby (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Ian Hickson (Friday, 16 January)
  - Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace James Graham (Friday, 16 January)
[Bug 6437] New: document.location should update when the browsing context is navigated without the Document changing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 15 January)
'propietary languages' section -- remove it Larry Masinter (Wednesday, 14 January)
- Re: 'propietary languages' section -- remove it Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 14 January)
  - Re: 'propietary languages' section -- remove it Maciej Stachowiak (Wednesday, 14 January)
[Bug 6434] New: plugins inside fallback content shouldn't be instantiated bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 14 January)
Funny parsing issue... Travis Leithead (Wednesday, 14 January)
- Re: Funny parsing issue... Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 14 January)
[Bug 6423] New: Names of confidence flag states inconsistent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 14 January)
Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 14 January)
[Bug 6390] New: Add a note about reaching after head state and the fragment mode bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 13 January)
[Bug 6389] New: Avoid double parse error on EOF in DOCTYPE state bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 13 January)
play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Simon Pieters (Tuesday, 13 January)
- Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Dave Singer (Tuesday, 13 January)
  - Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Philip Jägenstedt (Thursday, 15 January)
    - Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Dave Singer (Friday, 16 January)
Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 13 January)
- Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters (Tuesday, 13 January)
  - Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 13 January)
- Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters (Tuesday, 13 January)
  - Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 13 January)
- Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 13 January)
The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Giovanni Gentili (Friday, 9 January)
- RE: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Justin James (Friday, 9 January)
  - Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Tom Morris (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Toby A Inkster (Saturday, 10 January)
  - Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Cameron McCormack (Saturday, 10 January)
    - Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Karl Dubost (Sunday, 11 January)
IE compat with coords parsing Simon Pieters (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: IE compat with coords parsing Jonas Sicking (Friday, 9 January)
Re: Authoring Guide Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 9 January)
Named character references Maurice (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: Named character references Thomas Broyer (Friday, 9 January)
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Maurice (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Laurens Holst (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Laurens Holst (Friday, 9 January)
  - Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Laurens Holst (Friday, 9 January)
  - Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Laurens Holst (Friday, 9 January)
    - Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Olivier GENDRIN (Tuesday, 13 January)
  - Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 13 January)
    - Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Olivier GENDRIN (Tuesday, 13 January)
    - Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 13 January)
    - Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 13 January)
ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Shawn Medero (Thursday, 8 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Shawn Medero (Thursday, 8 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek (Friday, 9 January)
  - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robin Berjon (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Thomas Broyer (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robin Berjon (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jonas Sicking (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip Taylor (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat James Graham (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Dan Connolly (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Ian Hickson (Friday, 23 January)
    - RE: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Larry Masinter (Friday, 23 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robin Berjon (Saturday, 24 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen (Saturday, 24 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Sunday, 25 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Sunday, 25 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt (Sunday, 25 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 25 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Sunday, 25 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 25 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Sunday, 25 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Ian Hickson (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 25 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Michael A. Puls II (Monday, 26 January)
    - RE: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Larry Masinter (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Thomas Broyer (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli (Monday, 26 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jon Barnett (Friday, 16 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robin Berjon (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robert J Burns (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Thomas Broyer (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54 / ISSUE-4.: versioning and doctype-legacy-compat Robert J Burns (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) Sam Ruby (Tuesday, 20 January)
    - Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 20 January)
Re: Void elements in HTML (Was: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal) Jonas Sicking (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Making the HTML language self-describing Ian Hickson (Thursday, 8 January)
  - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Martin Atkins (Thursday, 8 January)
    - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Ian Hickson (Thursday, 8 January)
    - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Henri Sivonen (Thursday, 8 January)
    - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Ian Hickson (Thursday, 8 January)
  - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Jonas Sicking (Thursday, 8 January)
    - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Ian Hickson (Thursday, 8 January)
    - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Jonas Sicking (Friday, 9 January)
    - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Hallvord R. M. Steen (Monday, 12 January)
    - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing James Graham (Monday, 12 January)
  - Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Andrew Fedoniouk (Thursday, 8 January)
Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Justin Anthony Knapp (Tuesday, 6 January)
- Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 6 January)
  - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) (Tuesday, 6 January)
  - RE: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Justin James (Tuesday, 6 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Preston L. Bannister (Tuesday, 6 January)
  - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart John Allsopp (Tuesday, 6 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Boris Zbarsky (Tuesday, 6 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 6 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Andrew Fedoniouk (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Ian Hickson (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Martin Atkins (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Robert J Burns (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Thomas Broyer (Thursday, 8 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Thomas Broyer (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 January)
    - RE: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Justin James (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Robin Berjon (Tuesday, 6 January)
- Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Thomas Broyer (Friday, 9 January)
  - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Robert J Burns (Friday, 9 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Thomas Broyer (Sunday, 11 January)
    - Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Robert J Burns (Sunday, 11 January)
[Bug 6370] New: Float exponent part unclear about length of sequence bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 6 January)
[Bug 6357] New: <script> start tag parsing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 5 January)
[Bug 6356] New: 00:99:00 is a valid time string bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 5 January)
[Bug 6353] New: play() and pause() don't throw bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 5 January)
[Bug 6352] New: Port acknowledgements from WF2 to HTML5 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 5 January)
[Bug 6351] New: Add event handler attributes for all events defined in HTML5 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 5 January)
[Bug 6350] New: Port examples from WF2 to HTML5 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 5 January)
[Bug 6349] New: Rewrite the entire script processing model again bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 5 January)
Cookie-based HTTP Authentication (draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00) Thomas Broyer (Monday, 5 January)
- Re: Cookie-based HTTP Authentication (draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00) Thomas Broyer (Tuesday, 6 January)
Re: metadata content Dr. Olaf Hoffmann (Sunday, 4 January)
Named character references Robert J Burns (Friday, 2 January)
- Re: Named character references Philip Taylor (Friday, 2 January)
  - Re: Named character references Robert J Burns (Friday, 2 January)
Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Henri Sivonen (Friday, 2 January)
- Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Pat Hayes (Friday, 2 January)
  - Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Murray Maloney (Friday, 2 January)
Re: Drop foster-parented stuff on the floor if parent gone Henri Sivonen (Friday, 2 January)
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Jonas Sicking (Friday, 2 January)
- Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Henri Sivonen (Friday, 2 January)
- Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Maciej Stachowiak (Friday, 2 January)
  - Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Jonas Sicking (Saturday, 3 January)
    - Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Maciej Stachowiak (Saturday, 3 January)
    - Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Jonas Sicking (Saturday, 3 January)
    - Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Henri Sivonen (Sunday, 4 January)
- Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Jonas Sicking (Saturday, 3 January)
Re: link relationship registration Asbjørn Ulsberg (Friday, 2 January)
Understanding why RDFa is useful Charles McCathieNevile (Friday, 2 January)
- Re: Understanding why RDFa is useful Ian Hickson (Friday, 2 January)
Re: Void elements in HTML (Was: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal) Robert J Burns (Thursday, 1 January)
Re: Void elements in HTML Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 1 January)
- Re: Void elements in HTML Philip Taylor (Thursday, 1 January)

public-html@w3.org from January 2009 by thread