W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:25:48 +0100
Message-ID: <18816.38172.691173.395024@opera.com>
To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Also sprach Murray Maloney:

 > Having to keep two documents synchrounously correct is certainly
 > going to require some QA effort, but that will also yield a quality product.

If this is a sure way to author quality specifications, why aren't all
specifications written this way?

Personally, I don't think any amount of QA effort can keep two
different documents describing the same matter from being in conflict
with each other.

              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 17:26:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:41 UTC