- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:22:40 -0500
- To: Philip TAYLOR <chaa006@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 20 janv. 2009 à 06:35, Philip TAYLOR a écrit : > I therefore propose that the HTML 5 DOCTYPE should include, > /at the very least/ the major (5) and minor (initially 0) > elements of its version number. Validators (or conformance checkers) are one thing. But it would be better to have a table of tools and their behaviours with regards to the DOCTYPE. So the question nails down. 1. Which are the tools which modify their behaviour according to a versioned doctype? 2. Which issues will these tools have with no versioned doctype ? # Browsers This is case is pretty much set and had been ad nauseam discussed. <!DOCTYPE html> triggers the standard mode. # Authoring tools # Converters # Tidying tools # Semantic parsers (if any) Maybe there will be issues, maybe not. -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 12:22:55 UTC