Karl Dubost wrote: > Le 29 janv. 2009 à 10:55, David Singer a écrit : >> This is an opinion shared by others on this list. > > No please. > Murray is part of the list and has a different opinions. Many people > have very divergent opinions. Karl, did you read an "all" into what David said? As far as I can tell, all he's saying is that he's not alone in having the opinion that having two normative specifications covering the same ground would be a significant source of problems. This is empirically a true statement. For example, Hakon has the same opinion. I happen to as well, though I haven't said anything on the topic so far. Now it might be that we're all wrong, of course. But the claim that David's not alone in holding this opinion holds. I appreciate your position on the spec as it stands, but it's not clear to me from your mail whether you actually disagree with the above opinion. As far as I can tell you support three separate normative non-overlapping specifications, not multiple normative specifications covering the same ground. -BorisReceived on Thursday, 29 January 2009 16:34:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:41 UTC