(Back on public-html since this is about changes to the spec.) On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 17:01 +0100, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > [...] > > I suggest simply marking it with a big-issue note stating that the > > section is intended to be removed pending its inclusion in an > > alternative spec. > > Yes, I like that idea; please do that, Ian. I'm very confused. Which section are we talking about removing? > While you're at it, feel free to note the 2 possibilities Henri outlined > in his message of Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:33:27 +0200. Could you elaborate on which section you think should get a note, and what the note should say? I'm very confused here. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 01:29:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:41 UTC