- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:28:32 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html@w3.org
(Back on public-html since this is about changes to the spec.) On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 17:01 +0100, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > [...] > > I suggest simply marking it with a big-issue note stating that the > > section is intended to be removed pending its inclusion in an > > alternative spec. > > Yes, I like that idea; please do that, Ian. I'm very confused. Which section are we talking about removing? > While you're at it, feel free to note the 2 possibilities Henri outlined > in his message of Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:33:27 +0200. Could you elaborate on which section you think should get a note, and what the note should say? I'm very confused here. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 01:29:08 UTC