public-html@w3.org from January 2009 by author

Adam Barth

• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Origin IETF draft (Monday, 19 January)

Adrian Bateman

• RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Monday, 26 January)

Andi Sidwell

• Requirements for testsuite (Wednesday, 28 January)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Publishing HTML5 (was: Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4) (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Void elements in HTML (Thursday, 1 January)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

• Re: link relationship registration (Friday, 2 January)

Ben Boyle

• Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: autocomplete on form (Sunday, 18 January)

Ben Millard

• Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Saturday, 17 January)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)

Bruce Lawson

• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Saturday, 17 January)
• Proposed amends to <small> element (Thursday, 15 January)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 6508] New: XHTML doctype without system identifier (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 6507] New: Paragraphs section doesn't list all transparent elements (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 6506] New: should h:tml draft include descriptions of element-specific APIs? (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 6505] New: should h:tml draft describe for authors how relative URLs are resolved? (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 6504] New: description of what target attribute represents should not use term "browsing context" (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 6503] New: to what degree should formalisms be used (if at all) in the h:tml draft? (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 6502] New: should the canvas element be omitted from h:tml draft? (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 6501] New: should obsolete elements be omitted from h:tml draft? (Friday, 30 January)
• [Bug 6497] New: Examples using title="" with line breaks (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 6496] New: Allow <img aria-labelledby> to act as a caption (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 6494] New: Make the requiredness about alt more obvious (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 6493] New: Use encoding of POSTing document for POST response if meta prescan fails (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 6491] New: <textarea wrap=off> not supported (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 6490] New: Event handler attributes should ignore event's interface (Thursday, 29 January)
• [Bug 6477] New: HTMLInputElement.width and height (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [Bug 6476] New: cross-origin media element loads and progress events (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [Bug 6475] New: Missing event handler attributes (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [Bug 6474] New: Event handler DOM attributes on HTMLDocument (Tuesday, 27 January)
• [Bug 6464] New: Support meta refresh with quotes (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 6462] New: Self-reference and cyclic references in headers='' (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 6461] New: Fix the definition of "Origin" for Documents from javascript: URLs (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 6460] New: Handle onerror feedback for Workers (Wednesday, 21 January)
• [Bug 6457] New: registerContentHandler() and sniffing (Tuesday, 20 January)
• [Bug 6440] New: To which elements applies the formatBlock command? (Thursday, 15 January)
• [Bug 6439] New: <area> should stringify href (like <a>) (Thursday, 15 January)
• [Bug 6438] New: Error in step 9.4 of the internal algorithm for scanning and assigning header cells (Thursday, 15 January)
• [Bug 6437] New: document.location should update when the browsing context is navigated without the Document changing (Thursday, 15 January)
• [Bug 6434] New: plugins inside fallback content shouldn't be instantiated (Wednesday, 14 January)
• [Bug 6423] New: Names of confidence flag states inconsistent (Wednesday, 14 January)
• [Bug 6390] New: Add a note about reaching after head state and the fragment mode (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 6389] New: Avoid double parse error on EOF in DOCTYPE state (Tuesday, 13 January)
• [Bug 6370] New: Float exponent part unclear about length of sequence (Tuesday, 6 January)
• [Bug 6357] New: <script> start tag parsing (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 6356] New: 00:99:00 is a valid time string (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 6353] New: play() and pause() don't throw (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 6352] New: Port acknowledgements from WF2 to HTML5 (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 6351] New: Add event handler attributes for all events defined in HTML5 (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 6350] New: Port examples from WF2 to HTML5 (Monday, 5 January)
• [Bug 6349] New: Rewrite the entire script processing model again (Monday, 5 January)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF (Saturday, 10 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Understanding why RDFa is useful (Friday, 2 January)

Chris Reeve

• Parsing problem with misnested tags (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Detailed review of Section 1. Introduction. (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 16 January)

Chris Wilson

• RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)

Dailey, David P.

• RE: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] (Saturday, 31 January)
• RE: other constituencies for the discussion [was Re: certificates of anonymity] (Friday, 30 January)
• other constituencies for the discussion [was Re: certificates of anonymity] (Friday, 30 January)
• certificates of anonymity (Friday, 30 January)
• html sans html (Wednesday, 21 January)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 23 January)
• funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials (Friday, 23 January)
• "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Monday, 19 January)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Tuesday, 20 January)

Dave Singer

• Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async (Tuesday, 13 January)

David Singer

• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)

Dean Edridge

• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)

Doug Schepers

• Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 23 January)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

• Re: metadata content (Sunday, 4 January)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) (Friday, 23 January)

Gervase Markham

• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)

Giovanni Gentili

• The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF (Friday, 9 January)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• Re: <dialog> (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: <dialog> (Wednesday, 28 January)
• D: a single letter element name for dialogue (Wednesday, 28 January)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Monday, 19 January)
• cloneNode() and script execution (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Monday, 12 January)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Glass houses and stones (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Tuesday, 20 January)
• ACTION-96: Origin removal (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state (Sunday, 4 January)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 2 January)
• Re: Drop foster-parented stuff on the floor if parent gone (Friday, 2 January)
• Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state (Friday, 2 January)

Håkon Wium Lie

• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Table feedback (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• ISSUE-54: <!DOCTYPE HTML SYSTEM "about:legacy-compat"> (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• RE: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: <dialog> (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: <dialog> (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: <dialog> (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: <bb> - typo, rename? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) (Friday, 23 January)
• Dynamic entries in the Application Cache removed (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: html sans html (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: online/offline events and bubbling (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Detailed review of Section 1. Introduction. (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Document conformance and non-empty <script src> (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Determining Script Type (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Race conditions in HTML 5? (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: 'propietary languages' section -- remove it (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Funny parsing issue... (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Thursday, 8 January)
• Making the HTML language self-describing (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Re: Understanding why RDFa is useful (Friday, 2 January)

James Graham

• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Setting document.domain (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Monday, 19 January)
• Table Inspector updated to new HTML 5 algorithm (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Monday, 12 January)

Jens Meiert

• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)

Jim Jewett

• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Tuesday, 20 January)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 9 January)

John Allsopp

• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)

John C. Vernaleo

• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)

Jon Barnett

• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: autocomplete on form (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: IE compat with coords parsing (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Void elements in HTML (Was: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal) (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state (Saturday, 3 January)
• Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state (Saturday, 3 January)
• Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state (Saturday, 3 January)
• Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state (Friday, 2 January)

Joseph A Holsten

• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)

Julian Reschke

• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)

Justin Anthony Knapp

• Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)

Justin James

• RE: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF (Friday, 9 January)
• RE: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• RE: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Default Style Sheet in Webkit and Mozilla (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF (Sunday, 11 January)

Kornel Lesiński

• Re: html sans html (Thursday, 22 January)

L. David Baron

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Registering the about: URI scheme (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: autocomplete on form (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: autocomplete on form (was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs) (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Authoring Guide (Friday, 9 January)

Larry Masinter

• RE: biased surveys and other tricks (Thursday, 29 January)
• RE: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• voting, surveys, juries, spec splitting (Wednesday, 28 January)
• biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• RE: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: Origin IETF draft (Monday, 19 January)
• RE: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Sunday, 18 January)
• 'propietary languages' section -- remove it (Wednesday, 14 January)

Laurens Holst

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 9 January)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Images and alternative text (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Thursday, 8 January)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: voting, surveys, juries, spec splitting (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: 'propietary languages' section -- remove it (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state (Saturday, 3 January)
• Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state (Friday, 2 January)

Martin Atkins

• Re: Making the HTML language self-describing (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)

Maurice

• Named character references (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Friday, 9 January)

Michael A. Puls II

• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)

Michael(tm) Smith

• My limited availability for next several days (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Monday, 26 January)

Murray Maloney

• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 2 January)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Tuesday, 13 January)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 (Friday, 2 January)

Patrick H Lauke

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Proposed amends to <small> element (Saturday, 17 January)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async (Thursday, 15 January)

Philip TAYLOR

• Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Named character references (Friday, 2 January)
• Re: Void elements in HTML (Thursday, 1 January)

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Glass houses and stones (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)

Preston L. Bannister

• Re: cloneNode() and script execution (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)

Rob Sayre

• Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] (Saturday, 31 January)

Robert J Burns

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Openness creating deliverables that tend to reflect the views of the WG (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54 / ISSUE-4.: versioning and doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Sunday, 11 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Named character references (Friday, 2 January)
• Named character references (Friday, 2 January)
• Re: Void elements in HTML (Was: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal) (Thursday, 1 January)

Robin Berjon

• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Tuesday, 6 January)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)

Sam Ruby

• Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] (Saturday, 31 January)
• Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] (Saturday, 31 January)
• Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Process Model [was: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4] (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Thursday, 8 January)

Shawn Medero

• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Thursday, 8 January)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• window.onerror initial value (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace (Thursday, 15 January)
• play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• IE compat with coords parsing (Friday, 9 January)

Smylers

• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: biased surveys and other tricks (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD (Friday, 23 January)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Monday, 26 January)
• Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: about draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth (the Cookie Authentication Scheme) and ISSUE-13 (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Sunday, 11 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Named character references (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Cookie-based HTTP Authentication (draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00) (Tuesday, 6 January)
• Cookie-based HTTP Authentication (draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00) (Monday, 5 January)

Toby A Inkster

• Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF (Saturday, 10 January)

Tom Morris

• Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF (Friday, 9 January)

Travis Leithead

• RE: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode (Thursday, 29 January)
• RE: html sans html (Thursday, 22 January)
• Funny parsing issue... (Wednesday, 14 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 21:55:56 UTC