- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:10:32 -0800
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:58 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> I would be happy to see a structured discussion led by the chairs > > Let's test that assertion. > > The structured discussion that I would like to propose is that we > produce concrete specs, distribute those specs widely, identify > specific issues with those specs, and block progress of any and all > such drafts to the Proposed Recommendation stage until those issues > are disposed of one way or another. I'd like to ask for a clarification. Is this meant to imply that we would not block progress to any stage earlier than Proposed Recommendation, or do we still take a group decision at those other transitions? In other words, are you proposing that advancement to FPWD, LC and CR should be essentially automatic? Or was your "to" meant to be a "towards"? Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 13:11:13 UTC