W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:10:32 -0800
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-id: <A91D51D1-00DF-46F7-B92D-E462FEBE68FE@apple.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>

On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:58 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> I would be happy to see a structured discussion led by the chairs
> Let's test that assertion.
> The structured discussion that I would like to propose is that we  
> produce concrete specs, distribute those specs widely, identify  
> specific issues with those specs, and block progress of any and all  
> such drafts to the Proposed Recommendation stage until those issues  
> are disposed of one way or another.

I'd like to ask for a clarification. Is this meant to imply that we  
would not block progress to any stage earlier than Proposed  
Recommendation, or do we still take a group decision at those other  
transitions? In other words, are you proposing that advancement to  
FPWD, LC and CR should be essentially automatic? Or was your "to"  
meant to be a "towards"?

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 13:11:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:41 UTC