- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:53:50 +0100
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > The reason for having a DOCTYPE that is well formed in XML is that there > are people who want to be able to serve their documents as either HTML > or XHTML, and be conforming in both. Although this point is probably No, that's not the only reason. As far as I can tell, this discussion started because XSLT 1.0 can't produce valid HTML5 (as text/html) without using optional features (that for instance do not work in Firefox) or extensions. Later on, we found that there are HTML serializers that suffer from the same constraint. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 17 January 2009 16:54:35 UTC