Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat

James Graham wrote:
> ...
>> 2) DOCTYPE with an optional null quoted string
> I can live with this but it seems suboptimal since the differences 
> between this and <!doctype html> and the longer form are not 
> self-descriptive.
> ...

There is no difference, so from this p.o.v. an empty string is just 
fine. Anything else indeed suggests that there is a difference.

> ...

BR, Julian

Received on Saturday, 17 January 2009 17:19:07 UTC