Karl Dubost wrote: > Having followed the work since its inception, having been the first > (interim) staff contact on this WG, I can tell you that the document, as > it is now, doesn't please me at all. I'm not at W3C anymore (keeping the > consensus and being neutral), so it is easier to voice my opinion. What > I wish for the documents: > > * a normative Mark Up document explaining the language and its > semantics. (Yes the thing with just the brackets and no DOM) > * a normative document for parsing and dealing with the errors and how > to create a DOM. > * separate normative documents for the different APIs. (there were > positive moves in this direction) Yes please : exactly what I would like to see, too, Philip TAYLORReceived on Thursday, 29 January 2009 16:40:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:42 UTC