- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:58:51 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Karl Dubost wrote: > > > Le 23 janv. 2009 à 07:05, James Graham a écrit : >> The markup language spec duplicates material that is already in the >> HTML 5 spec. My understanding is that a FPWD puts a document on the >> REC track so I presume it would be expected to be a largely normative >> document. > > no. A document which is published as first WD can become a W3C Note as > well. > Ah, it seems that I did not read the process document closely enough. Apologies. As I previously said, if the intent is to end up with a non-normative document, I do not have general objections to publishing (although I may have specific comments on the document itself of course). Otherwise, my previous points stand.
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 12:57:33 UTC