- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:40:04 +0100
- To: "Leif Halvard Silli" <lhs@malform.no>
- Cc: "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:53:51 +0100, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no> wrote: > What you say implies that those two pages must always be 100% in line > with the rest of the spec - as a mirror, at each and every moment. Which > would be nice of course if they were. But in fact, it is enough that > they are 100% correct and updated only when the document is supposed to > be ready ... at Last Call or something. What I'm saying is that those things take time to write and maintain. > Also, we do not need to consider those two pages only "reference" - they > can be considered part of the spec. And as such, the could function also > as a map of where we are headerd. > > Anyway, taking the name attribute of the anchor element: clicking the > link of for that attribute inside the attributes page could - until > that section was written - lead to a placeholder of some sort. But there will be no section on the name attribute for the a element. It is gone. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 11:41:10 UTC