- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:21:36 +0100
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > And may be the spec doesn't need to be optimised for HTML guide authors > either. They can treat HTML 5 as a black box too, and just read HTML 4 > etc for the things that are obviously lacking in HTML 5. And in general. > Authors can dig. As the editor of an HTML 5 authoring guide, I'm largely satisfied with the content of the spec, and the direction in which it is moving, and am confident of being able to distil the relevant information from the spec into the guide. I see no need at all to refer to HTML4 for more information. However, I will admit that the spec is far from perfect. There are certainly a number of issues relating to the clarity of some element and attribute descriptions, and I'm sure I'll find more as I make further progress with the guide. But I haven't come across any major show stopper that cannot or will not be resolved in due course. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 15:22:22 UTC