Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat

On Jan 16, 2009, at 16:53, Sam Ruby wrote:

> If there are several options available which nobody has indicated  
> that they "can't live with", I have no problem leaving the decision  
> as to which of those several alternatives is to be picked to the  
> editor.

Then I "can't live with" <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "">, and in addition to  
the reasons I gave before, I cite Philip's research that shows we'd  
get more compatibility with a non-empty talisman.

Henri Sivonen

Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 15:06:37 UTC