- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:52:23 +0200
- To: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Jan 30, 2009, at 19:20, Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: > >> Given the recent suggestion that the WG needs some ground rules for >> taking on new drafts, I'd like to suggest that one of the ground >> rules be that editors disclose to the WG when a draft or a section >> of a draft comes into existence in response to private feedback the >> whole group isn't seeing. (Of course, I'd prefer even more openness.) > > As would we all. Perhaps the WHATWG would consider > shutting down their mailing list(s), web site(s) > and IRC channel(s) and conducting all HTML 5 business > solely through the media (lists, web pages, etc) of the W3C ? It was pointed out to me that my choice of words didn't unambiguously capture what I meant. My suggestion wasn't about venue. It was about the inability to discover the existence of motivating feedback even if one was following discussion on all well-known public venues and using continuous Web searches to track less known public venues. Everyone here *knows* that the WHATWG list and channel exist and the archives/logs can be inspected at will. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 17:53:05 UTC