- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:11:32 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > HTML is a declarative mark-up language, first and foremost, and should > be defined as such even if the behavioral aspects triggered by rendering > cause the DOM to be modified on the fly. There is considerable value in > defining what is valid HTML for both what-goes-over-the-wire and what > gets rendered on a browser. You've said this before, but you never replied to the last e-mail I sent on the thread trying to work out what made you believe this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Nov/0420.html Without understanding where you're coming from, it's hard to understand your position. I really _would_ like to understand why you believe this; if I understood that, maybe I would agree with you. Currently, I do not. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:12:08 UTC