On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > HTML is a declarative mark-up language, first and foremost, and should > be defined as such even if the behavioral aspects triggered by rendering > cause the DOM to be modified on the fly. There is considerable value in > defining what is valid HTML for both what-goes-over-the-wire and what > gets rendered on a browser. You've said this before, but you never replied to the last e-mail I sent on the thread trying to work out what made you believe this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Nov/0420.html Without understanding where you're coming from, it's hard to understand your position. I really _would_ like to understand why you believe this; if I understood that, maybe I would agree with you. Currently, I do not. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:12:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:41 UTC