Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat

Julian Reschke 2009-01-08 20.08:

> Sam Ruby wrote:
>> The suggestion was made that the name of this doctype be changed from 
>> xslt-compat to legacy-compat.
>> Any objections?
> No objections.

No objections, except that I agree with Julian.

> I personally liked Mike Smith's proposal (from back last year) just to 
> use the empty string, but apparently that's just me.

You were not alone. The current consensus appears to be driven by 
a desire for a string with a negative message.
leif halvard silli

Received on Thursday, 8 January 2009 20:12:39 UTC