- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:11:53 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Julian Reschke 2009-01-08 20.08:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
[...]
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/54
[...]
>> The suggestion was made that the name of this doctype be changed from
>> xslt-compat to legacy-compat.
[...]
>> Any objections?
>
> No objections.
No objections, except that I agree with Julian.
> I personally liked Mike Smith's proposal (from back last year) just to
> use the empty string, but apparently that's just me.
You were not alone. The current consensus appears to be driven by
a desire for a string with a negative message.
--
leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2009 20:12:39 UTC