Also sprach Robin Berjon: > > As I understand it, a Working Draft signals the intent to proceed > > along the Recommendation track, and the section you quoted describes > > what happens if for whatever reason the Working Draft is taken off > > that path. So what Boris said matches my understanding. > > Nope. Besides, Karl was quoting form the TR page, not from the > Process. > The Process has this to say: > > "A Working Draft is a document that W3C has published for review by > the community, including W3C Members, the public, and other technical > organizations. Some, but not all, Working Drafts are meant to advance > to Recommendation; see the document status section of a Working Draft > for the group's expectations." > -- http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#q73 But, all WDs were -- at some point by someone -- intended to become Recs, no? Or, if they weren't, didn't they say so from the start? -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcomeReceived on Friday, 30 January 2009 00:30:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:42 UTC