public-html@w3.org from January 2009 by date

Saturday, 31 January 2009

Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Table feedback Ian Hickson
RE: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Dailey, David P.
Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby
Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Philip TAYLOR
Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby
My limited availability for next several days Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Murray Maloney
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Murray Maloney
Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] Rob Sayre
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Lachlan Hunt
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Robert J Burns
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Murray Maloney
Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby

Friday, 30 January 2009

Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Robert J Burns
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Patrick H Lauke
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Philip TAYLOR
Moving forward on deciding [was: Intended Audience] Sam Ruby
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Openness creating deliverables that tend to reflect the views of the WG Robert J Burns
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Jonas Sicking
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Robert J Burns
Re: Glass houses and stones Henri Sivonen
RE: other constituencies for the discussion [was Re: certificates of anonymity] Dailey, David P.
Glass houses and stones Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Henri Sivonen
other constituencies for the discussion [was Re: certificates of anonymity] Dailey, David P.
Re: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs Simon Pieters
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Karl Dubost
[Bug 6508] New: XHTML doctype without system identifier bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Simon Pieters
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? David Singer
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? David Singer
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Philip TAYLOR
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
[Bug 6507] New: Paragraphs section doesn't list all transparent elements bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek
ISSUE-54: <!DOCTYPE HTML SYSTEM "about:legacy-compat"> Ian Hickson
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Simon Pieters
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
[Bug 6506] New: should h:tml draft include descriptions of element-specific APIs? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
[Bug 6505] New: should h:tml draft describe for authors how relative URLs are resolved? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6504] New: description of what target attribute represents should not use term "browsing context" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
[Bug 6503] New: to what degree should formalisms be used (if at all) in the h:tml draft? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost
[Bug 6502] New: should the canvas element be omitted from h:tml draft? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6501] New: should obsolete elements be omitted from h:tml draft? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Roy T. Fielding
certificates of anonymity Dailey, David P.
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Murray Maloney
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Lachlan Hunt
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 29 January 2009

Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Lachlan Hunt
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language L. David Baron
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Lachlan Hunt
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Robin Berjon
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Boris Zbarsky
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Robert J Burns
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Boris Zbarsky
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 David Singer
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Geoffrey Sneddon
[Bug 6497] New: Examples using title="" with line breaks bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 David Singer
[Bug 6496] New: Allow <img aria-labelledby> to act as a caption bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Lachlan Hunt
[Bug 6494] New: Make the requiredness about alt more obvious bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek
[Bug 6493] New: Use encoding of POSTing document for POST response if meta prescan fails bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Philip TAYLOR
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Philip TAYLOR
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Lachlan Hunt
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren
[Bug 6491] New: <textarea wrap=off> not supported bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode Philip Taylor
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Lachlan Hunt
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
[Bug 6490] New: Event handler attributes should ignore event's interface bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jens Meiert
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Henri Sivonen
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Jirka Kosek
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Henri Sivonen
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Roy T. Fielding
Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham
Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson
RE: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode Ian Hickson
Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham
Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham
RE: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode Travis Leithead
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney
Re: outerHTML/insertAdjecentHTML in XML mode Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Ian Hickson
Re: HTML is a declarative mark-up language Maciej Stachowiak
HTML is a declarative mark-up language Roy T. Fielding
Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson
Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson
Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham
Re: Setting document.domain Gervase Markham
Re: Setting document.domain Adam Barth
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Ian Hickson
Re: voting, surveys, juries, spec splitting Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Maciej Stachowiak
RE: biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter
Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Smylers
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Julian Reschke
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Ian Hickson
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Roy T. Fielding
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Robin Berjon
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson
RE: biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 John C. Vernaleo
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking
Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published L. David Baron
RE: biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter
Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Michael(tm) Smith
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney
RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Adrian Bateman
RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Adrian Bateman
RE: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Adrian Bateman
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Håkon Wium Lie
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
RE: biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney
voting, surveys, juries, spec splitting Larry Masinter
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Steven Faulkner
Re: biased surveys and other tricks David Singer
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Philip TAYLOR
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Steven Faulkner
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Lachlan Hunt
Re: biased surveys and other tricks Patrick H. Lauke
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby
biased surveys and other tricks Larry Masinter
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Murray Maloney
Requirements for testsuite Andi Sidwell
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 David Singer
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 David Singer
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Anne van Kesteren
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Anne van Kesteren
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Smylers
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Steven Faulkner
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Lachlan Hunt
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 James Graham
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 James Graham
Re: Setting document.domain James Graham
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Julian Reschke
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Philip TAYLOR
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Philip TAYLOR
Re: Setting document.domain Ian Hickson
Re: <dialog> Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Henri Sivonen
Re: <dialog> Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: <dialog> Ian Hickson
Re: <dialog> Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: <dialog> Ian Hickson
D: a single letter element name for dialogue Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Michael(tm) Smith
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Ian Hickson
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Lachlan Hunt
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Lachlan Hunt
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Jonas Sicking
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Karl Dubost
Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Sam Ruby
RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Jonas Sicking
RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Henri Sivonen
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Julian Reschke
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? James Graham
RE: Registering the about: URI scheme Larry Masinter
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Simon Pieters
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Thomas Broyer
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten
[Bug 6477] New: HTMLInputElement.width and height bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten
[Bug 6476] New: cross-origin media element loads and progress events bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Henri Sivonen
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Julian Reschke
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme James Graham
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Joseph A Holsten
window.onerror initial value Simon Pieters
[Bug 6475] New: Missing event handler attributes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Jonas Sicking
[Bug 6474] New: Event handler DOM attributes on HTMLDocument bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Simon Pieters
Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Ian Hickson
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Jonas Sicking
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Dean Edridge
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Jonas Sicking
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Sam Ruby

Monday, 26 January 2009

Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Philip Taylor
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Ian Hickson
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Ian Hickson
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Cameron McCormack
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Boris Zbarsky
Re: Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Cameron McCormack
Microsoft's cross-document messaging and DOM Storage tests published Adrian Bateman
RE: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Larry Masinter
Re: Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) Adam Barth
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Thomas Broyer
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Anne van Kesteren
Origin header in loading external scripts (ISSUE-63) Thomas Broyer
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) Simon Pieters
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Michael A. Puls II
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli
Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Ian Hickson

Sunday, 25 January 2009

Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke

Saturday, 24 January 2009

Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen
Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Ben Boyle
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robin Berjon
Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Doug Schepers
Re: about draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth (the Cookie Authentication Scheme) and ISSUE-13 Thomas Broyer

Friday, 23 January 2009

Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Lachlan Hunt
Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Dan Connolly
Re: funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials Murray Maloney
RE: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Larry Masinter
Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Ben Millard
Re: Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Ian Hickson
Re: funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials Ian Hickson
RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Larry Masinter
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Jonas Sicking
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Doug Schepers
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Jonas Sicking
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Steven Faulkner
Default Style Sheet in Webkit and Mozilla Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD L. David Baron
Update to html5-diff (ISSUE-65) Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Dan Connolly
RE: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Larry Masinter
Re: "Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Philip TAYLOR (ret'd)
funding from Adobe to work on HTML 5 authoring materials Dan Connolly
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Robin Berjon
Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD James Graham
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD James Graham
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Steven Faulkner
Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Ian Hickson
ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD Sam Ruby
RE: ACTION-96: Origin removal Larry Masinter
Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Jonas Sicking
Re: <bb> - typo, rename? Ian Hickson
Re: Lose Focus When Hidden? (SVG ISSUE-2031) Ian Hickson

Thursday, 22 January 2009

RE: ACTION-95, ISSUE-65: Plan to publish a new WD of HTML-5 Chris Wilson
RE: ACTION-96: Origin removal Larry Masinter
Dynamic entries in the Application Cache removed Ian Hickson
RE: html sans html Travis Leithead
Re: html sans html Kornel Lesiński
Re: html sans html Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Adam Barth

Wednesday, 21 January 2009

html sans html Dailey, David P.
[Bug 6464] New: Support meta refresh with quotes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
RE: online/offline events and bubbling Ian Hickson
[Bug 6462] New: Self-reference and cyclic references in headers='' bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6461] New: Fix the definition of "Origin" for Documents from javascript: URLs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Parsing problem with misnested tags Chris Reeve
[Bug 6460] New: Handle onerror feedback for Workers bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 20 January 2009

Re: ISSUE-54 / ISSUE-4.: versioning and doctype-legacy-compat Robert J Burns
"Video, Audio, and Media in HTML 5" (and outline/sketch of other author/developer ideas) Dan Connolly
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Thomas Broyer
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) Dan Connolly
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat (leaking into ISSUE-4 (html-versioning)) Dan Connolly
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Boris Zbarsky
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robert J Burns
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Boris Zbarsky
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Boris Zbarsky
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Karl Dubost
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robin Berjon
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR
Process Model [was: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4] Sam Ruby
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Anne van Kesteren
[Bug 6457] New: registerContentHandler() and sniffing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Daniel Glazman
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Anne van Kesteren
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Henri Sivonen
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Jonas Sicking
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Bruce Lawson
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Jim Jewett
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Dan Connolly
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Hallvord R. M. Steen
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Maciej Stachowiak
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Hallvord R. M. Steen
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Ian Hickson

Monday, 19 January 2009

Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Sam Ruby
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Sam Ruby
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Origin IETF draft Adam Barth
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Boris Zbarsky
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Jonas Sicking
RE: Origin IETF draft Larry Masinter
RE: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Chris Wilson
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Lachlan Hunt
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal James Graham
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Dan Connolly
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Simon Pieters
Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal Sam Ruby
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Boris Zbarsky
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Lachlan Hunt
Publishing HTML5 (was: Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4) Anne van Kesteren
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Sam Ruby
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Ian Hickson
Table Inspector updated to new HTML 5 algorithm James Graham
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Hallvord R. M. Steen
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Preston L. Bannister
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Sam Ruby

Sunday, 18 January 2009

ACTION-96: Origin removal Henri Sivonen
Re: Detailed review of Section 1. Introduction. Ian Hickson
Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Robert J Burns
RE: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4 Larry Masinter
Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented Boris Zbarsky
Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented Boris Zbarsky
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Boris Zbarsky
Re: Detailed review of Section 1. Introduction. Chris Reeve

Friday, 16 January 2009

Re: Images and alternative text Chris Reeve

Sunday, 18 January 2009

Re: cloneNode() and script execution Jonas Sicking
Re: cloneNode() and script execution Andrew Fedoniouk
cloneNode() and script execution Hallvord R. M. Steen
Re: autocomplete on form Ben Boyle

Saturday, 17 January 2009

Re: autocomplete on form Jonas Sicking
Re: autocomplete on form Lachlan Hunt
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Ian Hickson
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Ben Millard
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Patrick H. Lauke
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Bruce Lawson
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Lachlan Hunt
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Bruce Lawson
Re: Proposed amends to <small> element Ben Millard

Friday, 16 January 2009

Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jonas Sicking
Re: Images and alternative text Leif Halvard Silli
Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Dave Singer
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli
Re: autocomplete on form (was: Comparing conformance requirements against real-world docs) Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robin Berjon
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip TAYLOR
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Thomas Broyer
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jon Barnett
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Robin Berjon
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat James Graham
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Philip Taylor
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Henri Sivonen
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Lachlan Hunt
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace James Graham
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Simon Pieters
Re: type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Jonas Sicking
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Jonas Sicking
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Ian Hickson
Re: Document conformance and non-empty <script src> Ian Hickson
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Sam Ruby
Re: Determining Script Type Ian Hickson

Thursday, 15 January 2009

Re: Race conditions in HTML 5? Ian Hickson
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Ian Hickson
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Boris Zbarsky
Proposed amends to <small> element Bruce Lawson
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Simon Pieters
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Henri Sivonen
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Boris Zbarsky
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Anne van Kesteren
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace James Graham
Re: Placing elements in the HTML namespace Sam Ruby
[Bug 6440] New: To which elements applies the formatBlock command? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6439] New: <area> should stringify href (like <a>) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6438] New: Error in step 9.4 of the internal algorithm for scanning and assigning header cells bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Placing elements in the HTML namespace James Graham
Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Philip Jägenstedt
[Bug 6437] New: document.location should update when the browsing context is navigated without the Document changing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 14 January 2009

Re: 'propietary languages' section -- remove it Maciej Stachowiak
Re: 'propietary languages' section -- remove it Ian Hickson
'propietary languages' section -- remove it Larry Masinter
Re: Funny parsing issue... Ian Hickson
[Bug 6434] New: plugins inside fallback content shouldn't be instantiated bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Funny parsing issue... Travis Leithead
[Bug 6423] New: Names of confidence flag states inconsistent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: DOM traversal ambiguity question Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 13 January 2009

Re: play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Dave Singer
[Bug 6390] New: Add a note about reaching after head state and the fragment mode bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6389] New: Avoid double parse error on EOF in DOCTYPE state bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Olivier GENDRIN
play() sometimes doesn't do anything now that load() is async Simon Pieters
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson
Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: [[Get]] method on HTMLDocument (detailed review of the DOM) Ian Hickson

Monday, 12 January 2009

Re: Making the HTML language self-describing James Graham
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Hallvord R. M. Steen

Sunday, 11 January 2009

Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Karl Dubost
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Robert J Burns
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Thomas Broyer

Saturday, 10 January 2009

Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Cameron McCormack
Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Toby A Inkster

Friday, 9 January 2009

Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Robert J Burns
Re: IE compat with coords parsing Jonas Sicking
Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Tom Morris
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Jonas Sicking
RE: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Justin James
The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF Giovanni Gentili
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
IE compat with coords parsing Simon Pieters
Re: Authoring Guide Lachlan Hunt
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Laurens Holst
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Laurens Holst
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Laurens Holst
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Jirka Kosek
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Thomas Broyer
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Laurens Holst
Re: Named character references Thomas Broyer
Named character references Maurice
Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Maurice
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli

Thursday, 8 January 2009

Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Shawn Medero
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Shawn Medero
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Leif Halvard Silli
Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Julian Reschke
ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat Sam Ruby
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Ian Hickson
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Henri Sivonen
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Ian Hickson
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Jonas Sicking
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Ian Hickson
Re: Making the HTML language self-describing Martin Atkins
Making the HTML language self-describing Ian Hickson
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Thomas Broyer

Wednesday, 7 January 2009

Re: Void elements in HTML (Was: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal) Jonas Sicking
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Robert J Burns
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Martin Atkins
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Julian Reschke
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Thomas Broyer
RE: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Justin James
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Julian Reschke
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Ian Hickson
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Julian Reschke
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Ian Hickson
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart John Allsopp

Wednesday, 7 January 2009

Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Ian Hickson
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Andrew Fedoniouk

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Ian Hickson
Re: Cookie-based HTTP Authentication (draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00) Thomas Broyer
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Boris Zbarsky
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Preston L. Bannister
RE: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Justin James
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Robin Berjon
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
Re: Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Boris Zbarsky
Write-up about semantics in HTML5 from A List Apart Justin Anthony Knapp
[Bug 6370] New: Float exponent part unclear about length of sequence bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 5 January 2009

[Bug 6357] New: <script> start tag parsing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6356] New: 00:99:00 is a valid time string bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6353] New: play() and pause() don't throw bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6352] New: Port acknowledgements from WF2 to HTML5 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6351] New: Add event handler attributes for all events defined in HTML5 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6350] New: Port examples from WF2 to HTML5 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
[Bug 6349] New: Rewrite the entire script processing model again bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Cookie-based HTTP Authentication (draft-broyer-http-cookie-auth-00) Thomas Broyer

Sunday, 4 January 2009

Re: metadata content Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Henri Sivonen

Saturday, 3 January 2009

Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Jonas Sicking
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Jonas Sicking
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Jonas Sicking

Friday, 2 January 2009

Re: Named character references Robert J Burns
Re: Named character references Philip Taylor
Named character references Robert J Burns
Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Murray Maloney
Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Pat Hayes
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Henri Sivonen
Re: Drop foster-parented stuff on the floor if parent gone Henri Sivonen
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Henri Sivonen
Re: Conditional branch in tree builder based on DOM state Jonas Sicking
Re: Understanding why RDFa is useful Ian Hickson
Re: link relationship registration Asbjørn Ulsberg
Understanding why RDFa is useful Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 1 January 2009

Re: Void elements in HTML (Was: ZIP-based packages and URI references into them ODF proposal) Robert J Burns
Re: Void elements in HTML Philip Taylor
Re: Void elements in HTML Anne van Kesteren

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 21:55:56 UTC