Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Sam Ruby wrote:
> 
> In yesterday's call, a number of issues were raised when the topic of 
> making "HTML 5: The Markup Language" available First Public Working 
> Draft.  A number of issues were raised during the discussion.  Whether 
> these were merely issues to be worked or meet the criteria for a Formal 
> Objections was less clear to me.
> 
> To help facilitate and focus the discussion, a few links:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/markup-spec/
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#first-wd
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#WGArchiveMinorityViews
> 
> It surprises me to have to say this given the makeup of this group, but: 
> don't be shy!

Ok, I'll start off the discussion. :-)

Could we add a section to the document that describes the intended 
audience? It would help with reviewing the document if there was a clear 
description of who the document was written for.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 11:39:48 UTC