- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:38:16 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
>> and how feedback to >> such a proposal is collected. > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/ So, having discussed with with DanC and Sam on IRC I think this statement is a little misleading. As far as I can tell (and I hope that someone will correct me if I am wrong), the mailing list (and, I guess, the bug database) is still the primary means for feedback. However if someone has feedback that they would like tracked in the tracker for whatever reason, they can request that an entry for it be added there. This request will be granted by someone with tracker write access subject to the requirement only that it is a genuine piece of feedback. This model seems a little different to that used by Mike Smith (in that model, the tracker represented issues of concern to the whole group) although I guess for issues not in the tracker, it is assumed that the feedback will be dealt with by the editor directly so maybe the net effect will be similar.
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 18:36:41 UTC