- From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:36:32 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Philip TAYLOR <chaa006@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Dan, I appreciate your trying to keep threads separate, but a discussion on DOCTYPEs that ignores the issue of versioning is (IMHO) simply too insular and too parochial. In all versions of HTML to date, the two have been inextricably interlinked. There cannot be consensus on "about:sgml-compat" unless there is already consensus on the need for versioning. Philip TAYLOR -------- Dan Connolly wrote: > We were having a nice discussion about issue-54; > as far as I could tell, we had consensus > on about:sgml-compat. > > Your proposal is more relevant to > ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/4 > > Please, don't cross the streams! If you're changing issues, > change the subject header... and consider a new thread > altogether.
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 21:37:21 UTC