- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 15:42:50 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Dec 25, 2008, at 13:03, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> Deferring tree mutations would become slightly simpler if >> foster-parented stuff was simply dropped when the table parent is >> gone. > > I haven't made this change. It would make other implementation > strategies > more complex, so there doesn't seem to be an overall clear > indication of > what would be best. What implementation strategy would be made more complex by not inserting stuff at all when the parent is gone? > Even in the deferred mutation case, it seems like you > could just use a "foster insert" action instead, which the main thread > would handle accordingly. This is possible, yes. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 2 January 2009 13:43:36 UTC