- From: Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:13:22 +1000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-html@w3.org
Or provide both approaches, and use healthy links between the two. Both approaches are very valid and will appeal to different people (or even the same person in different points of their career). On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi, Folks- > > Dan Connolly wrote (on 1/23/09 6:11 PM): >> On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 17:05 +0100, Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> [...] >>> Do you intend to make this follow a cookbook approach, which primarily >>> focuses on how to create specific kinds of content based on use cases? >> >> yes. >> >> But it does in some sense compete with the work you've started, >> e.g. for attention from reviewers. >> A little competition is healthy, no? ;-) > > Moreover, it's possible that any HTML deliverables might get merged and > recombined into the combination of documents that makes the best overall > approach. > > Regards- > -Doug Schepers > W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs > >
Received on Saturday, 24 January 2009 12:13:58 UTC