- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:03:48 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Cc: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:04:33 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > Yeah, I don't love the name either. I'm open to ideas, but the problem > > is any descriptive name becomes quite unwieldy and unlike other names. > > The same person who noted the typo and the potential for typos suggested > <browserbutton> or <nativebutton>. I'd personally prefer the former. On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Justin James wrote: > > I think that "browserbutton" is both descriptive and memorable for this > item, without the potential for typo problems like the other "ubutton" > or "bbutton" proposals. The problem is that those names are too similar to <button>, IMHO. They're also pretty long. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 01:04:24 UTC