Re: Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion

Michael(tm) Smith wrote on 11/25/2008 02:48:02 AM:
>
> Speaking in my official position as one of the current co-chairs
> for the group, I'd like to ask that we all agree to a voluntary
> moratorium for the time being on further discussion about if/how
> the existing HTML5 draft should be split into separate specs.
>
> I think it's been useful to have a discussion about it, but we are
> now at a point in the discussion where there really is not much
> new information being put forward. So I think at this point, Chris
> Wilson and I need to take a look at the record of the discussion
> and make a decision about how best to work further with the group
> on getting a resolution to the discussion.
>
> So please refrain for the time being from posting further messages
> to the list on the spec-splitting topic. That includes follow-ups
> or replies to other messages. For those cases, you are of course
> free to post replies off-list, including to me directly if it's
> something you want me to read. I just ask that you don't post them
> to the list for now.

Speaking in my official position as one of the current co-chairs for the
group, and after consultation with Chris Wilson, we would like to now
reduce the scope this moratorium to only apply to the public-html mailing
list.  Which means that effective immediately, those that wish to continue
this discussion are welcome to do so on www-archive@w3.org.

>   --Mike
>
> --
> Michael(tm) Smith
> http://people.w3.org/mike/

- Sam Ruby

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 01:37:12 UTC