Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD

On Jan 26, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> I would definitely be opposed to taking a subset that excludes APIs  
>> and
>> parsing requirements to CR before the full spec.
>
> Note that Mike's draft wouldn't be such a subset; he has clarified  
> that
> the target audience of his draft is the same as HTML5's target  
> audience,
> and thus excluding APIs and parsing requirements isn't an option for  
> that
> draft (they would be needed to address that audience's needs).

I'd also be opposed to taking a spec to CR that fails to meet its  
requirements. But it's not clear to me what the requirements for the  
Markup Language spec are.

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 12:40:26 UTC